Gaspar Noe's 3D Sex Film Re-Rated 18 | The Quietus

Gaspar Noe’s 3D Sex Film Re-Rated 18

In a move that seems to come without precedent, Love, the most recent film by director-writer and enfant terrible Gaspar Noe, has been re-classified 18 in France after an initial 16 rating and three weeks afters its theatrical release

In a recent interview with Marie Claire the consistently-divisive but ever-on-point Miley Cyrus gave some severe verbal side-eye to Taylor Swift’s video for ‘Bad Blood‘, quite rightly ruminating on the perceived harmfulness of her frequent semi-nudity vs the (albeit-hyper-stylised) violence of Swift’s visual effort: "I’m a bad role model because I’m running around with my titties out? I’m not sure how titties are worse than guns".

It’s a pointed barb in this instance but it’s also part of a much wider, more pervasive issue in art and in the media with fraught battlegrounds in the diverse no man’s lands of social media — see: Instagram and Facebook‘s continued efforts to police representation of the female body and subsequent righteous backlash —and arthouse cinema, in the re-packaging of Gaspar Noe’s Love.

While it’s not unlike Noe, the auteur writer and director of both 2002’s Irréversible and 2009’s Enter The Void, to court controversy, the film — a 3D “non-pornographic exploration of the beauty of love making” which features unchoreographed, unsimulated sex scenes — was originally handed a 16 rating in France after its premiere at Cannes earlier this year but has since been re-rated 18, apparently without precedent, three weeks after its release.

Weigh this up against, say, the exuberant and ultimately thoughtless violence of other recent films, take something as innocuous-seeming as Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation, for example, which has a 12A rating in the UK — meaning not only can you see a lot of stuff get blown up unncessearily and watch a lot of people get shot with reckless abandon (and most likely subsequently die because hey guess what violence has consequences!) — so if you’ve reached the giddy Everest of maturity that is being 12, in the company of a parent you can soak it all up regardless of your age, like a filthy sponge in a half-drained sink of day-old chicken water.

Beyond that, of course, there’s the murky issue of censorship and self-fulfilling prophecy: if you’re heavy-handed with directors work then, eventually, as Noe explains to Libération, “There is a risk that the filmmakers or writers censor themselves” and we end up with high-veneer, watered-down cinema across the board.

So it goes: you can search "#guns" on Instagram and find, amidst the odd bicep or two, a veritable doomsday armoury of firearms on display, but try posting a female nipple and you’re liable to get your account deleted or at least suspended. And you can make a film about shooting people with all the forethought of a surprise bowel movement and a two-year-old can watch it with their mum — but try and explore the various intricacies of adult sexual relationships with a sense of reality and philosophy in a controlled environment and no-one under 18 is going to see it in a country where the age of consent is 15.

Truly, I’m not sure how titties are worse than guns.

Follow @karlthomassmith on Twitter.

Don’t Miss The Quietus Digest

Start each weekend with our free email newsletter.

Help Support The Quietus in 2025

If you’ve read something you love on our site today, please consider becoming a tQ subscriber – our journalism is mostly funded this way. We’ve got some bonus perks waiting for you too.

Subscribe Now