The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Black Sky Thinking

Why Live Music On British TV Needs More Than Just Jools
Michael Hann , April 13th, 2017 16:23

With the 50th series of Later... with Jools Holland underway, TV is in dire need of more than just boogie woogie, says Michael Hann

Add your comment »

Spoon, who play the inaugral episode of Later's 50th series. Photo by Zackery Michael

Late on Friday night, a familiar, besuited figure will wheel on to our TV screens, bid us welcome, and unveil what is, apparently, the best new live music you could hope to see: the excellent Spoon, Anderson .Paak and Courtney Marie Andrews, the none-more-BBC Goldfrapp, and the plodding Kasabian. Fifty series in, Later… With Jools Holland is now the last show standing on terrestrial TV, music's only chance to reach an audience who haven't actively sought it out.

This isn't a nostalgic plea for the return of Top Of The Pops (though the repeats of that show on BBC4 present a more rounded view of pop music - the great, the absurd, the exploitative and the plain terrible - than any "curated" programme ever could), because one can easily argue we're living in a golden age of music programming. Boiler Room has brought scores of underground dance music scenes to light and to life; pretty much every band in the world can find some web channel or other to broadcast their live performances (the US radio station KEXP's video archive of live in-studio performances is pretty much a potted history of American guitar music).

In the UK, BBC4 and Sky Arts offer great documentaries and vintage performances one after the other (if you've never seen it, watch Metal Evolution on Sky's in-demand service; it's the best music documentary series ever, by miles). And Later … itself still throws up great stuff alongside the dreck.

So what's the problem? Is there actually a problem?

Yes, and it's the same one that occurs across society, with the Balkanisation of people's interests through the algorithms of social media. When that results in nearly half the population not understanding why the other half voted for Brexit, it's a serious issue. When it results in a band reaching only the already converted, there's less at stake, but it does still matter, for both bands, and for audiences.

The reason people of a certain age get all misty about Top Of The Pops isn't because they remember 'The Birdy Song' so fondly, or because Renee and Renato captured everything that was great about pop. It's for the memory of revelation, when something so extraordinary happened that you couldn't help but be transfixed by it, whether or not you knew the group, or even liked the music. At its most famous, this was David Bowie performing 'Starman'; a few years later it was Adam & the Ants making their TOTP debut with 'Dog Eat Dog'. It was New Order performing 'Blue Monday' live; it was Morrissey ripping off his shirt while The Smiths mimed to 'William, It Was Really Nothing'; it was Orbital doing 'Chime' or The Orb playing chess for their appearance to "perform" 'Blue Room'.

Pop's most divisive televisual moments have also been its most uniting, because they're the ones people remember, the ones people talk about for years to come. They're the ones where a group on the margins can suddenly, through force of personality, catapult themselves to a wider audience. And the audience in turn can see the possibilities that unfamiliar music can open up.

And those moments can still happen. For all the boogie-woogie-and-bonhomie of Later … With Jools Holland, it has also hosted thrilling performances - both Skepta and Stormzy have taken it by storm, though the fact that the young acts on Later get so easily swamped by the duvet of Radio 2-friendly "mature" artists blunts their impact. For real proof that the right performance on the right programme can still transform a group, you don't need to look back to the days of primetime music programmes, just to 3 March, 2014.

That night, a jobbing synthpop group, five albums into their career, made their debut on US network TV. Future Islands had been getting good reviews for years, and those who had seen them could testify to their power as performers. The only drawback was that so few people had actually seen or heard them perform. But when they performed 'Seasons (Waiting on You)' on The Late Show With David Letterman, everything changed. The power of old media - reaching everyone who cared to tune in - combined with the spread of new media, as the clip went viral.

The way to measure its success wasn't in the number of thinkpieces written about singer Samuel T Herring's extraordinary, unembarrassed emoting and dancing, but in the fact that suddenly people knew who Future Islands were, and wanted to know more. The album Singles went into the Top 40 on both sides of the Atlantic, and 'Seasons (Waiting on You)' headed end-of-year charts all over the place. Neither of those, almost certainly, would have happened without that Letterman performance imprinting the group in people's minds. It was a 'Starman' moment.

Whether or not you like Future Islands - and they do very little for me - that was something to celebrate. It was proof that the marginal need not remain in the margins, need not only maintain and expand its own cult, that it was possible to leap across boundaries. As Bowie had done, as Adam and the Ants had done, as the Smiths had done.

And that's what I want from music television in the UK again. I know Top Of The Pops is never coming back, and I'm fine with that. I can live with Later, though I can't help thinking it might be more talked about if it were Earlier. But I want one place, just one place, where musicians might appear in just the faintest hope that the next morning people say to each other: "Did you see that?" And then: "I'll send you the link."

Peter Blancmange
Apr 13, 2017 5:56pm

I'm pretty sure Seasick Steve is featured on every single episode I've ever seen.

Reply to this Admin


Apr 13, 2017 6:11pm

Fuck Jools Holland

Reply to this Admin


Apr 13, 2017 10:33pm

In reply to :

It's trad, Dad.

Reply to this Admin

Onan the Master Barbarian
Apr 13, 2017 11:15pm

I could be tainted by my own cynicism but I don't believe that a show as brilliantly un-focus(group)ed as TOTP or Whistle Test would be commissioned in 2017. If it's non-BBC then it has to have a clear demographic target otherwise advertisers will be wary; if Big British Castle then it needs to fit into one of their 'mission statement' agendas otherwise a commissioning editor gets fired.

I would argue that a similar problem exists for almost all the arts on telly in that, without a competition element and a phone line to cast votes and clear narratives to rile the audience up, it doesn't seem to appeal to a general audience.

Would also be interested to have a discussion about how the death of live music on the gogglebox fits in with the feast-or-famine nature of live music these days ie the mentality that leads to: "£100 for a huge pop artist's 90 min show in a megadome 2 hours from my house?" buys 5 tickets, "£5 for 3 hours of varied, young and hungry musicians in a tiny venue around the corner?" orders takeaway and watches xfactor at home.

Reply to this Admin

Alexander
Apr 14, 2017 2:32pm

I sometimes get the impression that Jools himself is bored of the show - It was a dream job that has turned into a chore and when he introduces a 'legendary' singer who has already been on the show six times already, he's secretly thinking "Oh blimey, not this old bugger again"
it's a good point about TOTP. I could never understand why certain music writers would always witter on about the "New Pop" of the eighties, then I saw it in context on the BBC4 repeats and it clicked - What a colourful, creative time for the pop scene. TOTP was never seen as cutting-edge, but one thing it was useful for was showing which pop stars came across best on television, and so you can well understand the frisson of seeing Adam Ant or Marc Almond or Ian McCulloch, in full flow for the first time.

Reply to this Admin


Apr 14, 2017 5:18pm

Totally agree, I've been banging on about this for years. TOTP, OGWT, Snub, Chart Show, The Tube, The Word, local music programming, loads more I've forgotten. How come with 3 or 4 channels we had good music tv and now with millions of channels we have okey cokey, ruby turner loving Jools Holland? Showing days of festival music is just not good enough! Look at the xmas totp, Christine & The Queens, straight away it made you sit up, it gave you something different. I really am mystified why we are so poorly served. How come you can have hours and hours of detective, cooking, hospitals, period but no music? How come you can have loads of radio music programming but no tv music programming, meh.

Reply to this Admin

Jon Thomas
Apr 15, 2017 9:18pm

In reply to :

The Christine and the Queens that were on Later... last April?
I think we just need Later.. With Anybody But Jools Holland

Reply to this Admin

Richie Sombrero
Apr 17, 2017 11:37am

The Radiohead special was mega at the time.

Reply to this Admin

James
2 days ago

Good article. Agree. Jools has been good in the past - best of compilation shows can be very good - but I think it has had its day.

And thanks for the tip on Metal Evolution. Just pressed record.

Reply to this Admin

James
2 days ago

In reply to James:

Also worth crediting the show for some excellent performances from lesser known artists at the time they appeared, Sleaford Mods being a good example. The performance of Jobseeker was so explosive and immediate.

Another recent one was Let's Eat Grandma - if ever there was a young act starting out that need exposure it is them.

But as someone else noted above, they get much less airtime than the more mature artists, which is a shame.

Reply to this Admin