The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Film Reviews

Bloody Mary: American Mary Reviewed
Sean Kitching , January 31st, 2013 09:10

Sean Kitching takes a look at Jen and Sylvia Soska's controversial body horror movie

Add your comment »

Alongside Peter Strickland’s excellent Berberian Sound Studio, Jen and Sylvia Soska’s American Mary was easily the most original film of 2012s Frightfest. Taking the world of body modification as its theme, the film stakes a claim to territory generally unmapped by Western horror films, although it can be found in the likes of Takeshi Miike’s Audition and the south-Korean Bong Man-dae’s Cinderella. Todd Browning’s Freaks and Twin Peaks era David Lynch, are also evident in the mix, as well as the kind of humour to be found in early John Waters films. In terms of its slick production values, the film is a massive leap from the ‘twisted twins’ previous feature, the grindhouse-inspired Dead Hooker in a Trunk, and although it never quite lives up to its original promise, it represents a further development of a unique and specifically female sensibility - two distinct aspects that the horror genre is sadly lacking in at present.

Katherine Isabelle, who excelled as a teen-werewolf in the film Ginger Snaps and its two sequels, is compelling in the role of Mary Mason, an attractive eastern-European medical student seeking the American dream of financial success. Struggling with her finances, whilst fielding calls from her grandmother in Budapest and dealing with the unsolicited attentions of deeply unpleasant male surgeons, Mary finds herself drawn deeper into an underground world of illicit body-modification surgery. Vancouver-based burlesque artist, Tristan Risk, plays Beatrice Johnson - a sympathetic character who has been surgically altered to look like Betty Boop. Beatrice introduces Mary to her first real body-modification operation in the person of Ruby Realgirl (Paula Lindberg), who coyly requests that her sexual organs be sealed shut so that she might fully resemble a doll. She tells a visibly shocked Mary: "I’ve never had any of these surgeries to become a sexual one looks at dolls in a sexual manner.... a doll can be naked and never feel shy or sexualised or degraded, that’s what I want."

The spiking of her drink and subsequent rape of Mary by her tutor marks the beginning of a major change in her character. Despite the fact that there are far more bloody moments in the movie, the way the camera dwells upon Mary’s stillness during the assault makes it perhaps the film’s most disturbing scene. Jen and Sylvia Soska have gone on record as saying that part of the film’s inspiration draws from their experiences as actors with casting directors and the ‘disgusting’ things that they often get away with. In choosing to use the medical world, in particular that of surgeons (who refer to themselves jokingly as ‘slashers’) to portray the inequality and abuse of power by men within the film-making industry, the Soskas establish a unique and macabre avenue for revenge by the film’s heroine. Once that moment of drug-enforced stillness and involuntary acquiescence has passed, Mary becomes the primary empowered figure of the piece, exacting a hideous but not undeserved revenge on Doctor Grant.

Many critics writing in the mainstream-press have questioned whether certain aspects of the film automatically rule it out from being perceived as a ‘feminist’ work. A scene in which Mary does an erotic dance whilst slowly pouring blood over herself is usually cited as the main example, although Katherine Isabelle’s dress sense - even when performing surgery - could similarly be called into question. Whilst it would be disingenuous to deny that the erotic dance scene leaves viewers feeling somewhat uncomfortable, it somewhat misses the point to suggest that this negates the value of the female perspective of the twin directors. The Soska sisters are uber-horror fans and horror has always had a strong prurient element, often displaced as violence towards women. Horror films are primarily an evocation of Thanatos and Eros, a celebration of sex and death - the two human impulses that could be seen as the main driving forces of modern society. In an interview, Sylvia Soska comments on the scene in question, saying: ‘‘I was only gonna put on a little spray, but she looked so good doused in blood, we kind of went crazy with it... but aesthetically it looked good.’

In this sense what sets American Mary apart from the majority of other horror films is the inversion of the usual power relationships between men and women. Mary becomes empowered, as well as both feared and respected by her underworld associates, precisely because she is both beautiful and skilled as a surgeon. A scene in which a character tells Mary how he wished he had known her when he enacted revenge on a youth who was involved in the death of his mother reveals the awe in which he holds her. Ultimately, American Mary accomplishes something of a different order entirely to other recent films which similarly could be termed feminist horror.

Lucky McKee’s The Woman largely eschews the female point of view in order to present a dark female, near Neanderthal archetype who, surprisingly, turns out to be the heroine of the piece by the end of the film. Richard Bates Jr’s Excision is told largely from a female point of view, but the character of Pauline is too in the grip of her own mental illness to be perceived as in control of her fate. Perhaps the best other example of a feminist character in a horror film that I can think of would be Jennifer in Frank Henenlotter’s Bad Biology. Born with a hypersexualised anatomy and the ability to give birth to disposable, mutant babies mere minutes after the culmination of the sexual act, Jennifer is an amazing character, self-possessed to the point where she exists in a place far beyond any usual sense of morality, conventional or otherwise. It is in such rare company that I would consider American Mary to reside. As a horror fan, I can hardly wait to see what the Soska sisters’ next move will be.

American Mary is out on DVD now

If you love our features, news and reviews, please support what we do with a one-off or regular donation. Year-on-year, our corporate advertising is down by around 90% - a figure that threatens to sink The Quietus. Hit this link to find out more and keep on Black Sky Thinking.

James Cleary
Jan 31, 2013 5:59pm

This movie stinks

Reply to this Admin

Jan 31, 2013 8:30pm

James Cleary stinks.

Reply to this Admin

Jan 31, 2013 10:08pm

we'll give it a try but as much as i wanted to like Berberian, it was the most clear case of emperor's new clothes i have seen in a bloody good while... ace soundtrack tho..

Reply to this Admin

Feb 1, 2013 11:00am

In reply to :

Doesn't anything with genuinely distinctive style get dismissed by people who don't get it/don't like it as "Emporer's new clothes"?

To me the use of that phrase reeks of critical laziness. Of course, everyone is welcome not to enjoy something, but come on: enter a debate with something of substance rather than a tired cliche, or please refrain from mindlessly slagging off things on the internet.

Reply to this Admin

Feb 3, 2013 10:27pm

It is available on DVD...

Reply to this Admin

James Cleary Appreciation Society
Feb 5, 2013 3:57pm

In reply to :

BLANK = Stinkiest

Reply to this Admin

Jul 25, 2014 9:18pm

American Mary is a bad movie. The revenge angle is paper thin with the flattest villain rapists of all time. Mary's revenge on the main rapist is incredibly UNimaginative. The feminist angle is completely contradicted when Mary nearly kills a girl who was just mouth-raped by the guy Mary thinks is cute (typical CW casting choice btw). The ending is completely ludicrous and has absolutely NOTHING to do with the throughline. Mary is neither a slasher, a horror film nor is it the least bit feminist. Word is the sisters fucked this project up so bad the producers had to bring in a ringer director for a week of reshoots to make the movie coherent. I wish y'all would stop drinking the Kool-Aid and admit the Emperor has no clothes, cause this is bullshit. This movie sucks from every angle (even the gore is lame/nonexistent.)
Andrew, I ask you, what is good about this movie??? There is no new style here, the thing looks slick because of the cinematographer from Drive Angry. And ok, Mary looks cool in her leather Dr. gear that she wears for no good reason... what else? There's nothing clever or original going on here. This is a vapid wasteland. These two have no talent. They are clearly just MARKETABLE! The story of them (the director goth twins) is cute, likable and sellable to fanboys and girls. The man behind the curtain is a man and he's filthy fucking rich. The Soskas are nothing more than a brand.

Reply to this Admin

M. Anthony
Nov 4, 2014 2:36am

In reply to Joan:

Wholly agree with Joan. I tried so hard to find something to sink my teeth into here, tried to figure out how I was missing what nearly every reviewer said this movie had going for it, but by the end I was just embarrassed. The 'jealous girlfriend' scene in particular was enervating as hell.

Reply to this Admin