The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

A Quietus Interview

On The Wing: Trent Reznor On Creativity & How To Destroy Angels
Ned Raggett , December 10th, 2012 11:28

With Nine Inch Nails currently on hiatus, Trent Reznor is currently hard at work on new project How To Destroy Angels, whose An Omen_ EP is out now. He speaks to Ned Raggett about exploring new avenues and the challenges of creativity

Add your comment »

With nearly a quarter century of active music making and recording under his belt in one form or another, Trent Reznor could be forgiven for wanting to take an extended break at some point. But in recent years he seems to have moved into full overdrive, even as his flagship identity Nine Inch Nails has gone on an extended hiatus.

One outlet is his new collaborative group How to Destroy Angels, featuring Rob Sheridan, his wife Mariqueen Maandig and another regular musical partner of recent years Atticus Ross, his Oscar co-winner for the soundtrack to David Fincher's The Social Network. Their second EP, An Omen_, features another understated, beautiful and tense group of songs, with vocals from both Reznor and Maandig but predominantly the latter, as on the striking featured single, 'Ice Age'.

In an understated, thoughtful phone conversation during a break from the band's recording sessions for their upcoming full-length release, Reznor delved deep into not only the creative impulses at play during the recording of An Omen_, but extended thoughts on the arc of his career, as well as what still drives him to create and experiment across a variety of fields.

The thing that struck me about this EP, even more so than the first one from 2010, is that space, silence and deliberation felt key throughout, especially on the latter three tracks. Was it always intended to be that way or did that come together as recording progressed?

Trent Reznor: We went into it with this long-range goal of trying to see what develops, to let it present itself and to experiment with a lot of styles and messages and tracks, and how they came together. What we felt was the shortcoming of the first EP was the result of it being just a few weeks in the studio to see what happens. It was kind of demo-ish to me, it felt like you could see the DNA of where it came from, that it hadn't really become its own thing yet, but it was fun to just to see it come out. In this day and age of music consumption, we felt that rather than letting it sit on the shelf and wait, we felt we should put it out just as a memento of where we were at that time.

Since then we've recorded a bulk of music that's always been living as an album. The decision to sign with Columbia as a means of really reaching out to more people than just the Nine Inch Nails fanbase was really the main reason behind that. So the decision to put a record out meant - should we start with singles, should we put some tracks out? The idea of a strong EP came up, so we extracted some tracks that felt like they could fit together. They were meant to be on the album and some may remain. We spent a couple of months tinkering around with the sequencing and we wrote another track for it, there's still a lot of glue keeping it all together and I'm pleased with the results. I think it's an interesting EP that gelled together pretty nicely.

Asking a little more on the collaborative nature of the EP, now that you feel the group has transitioned more into its own thing. Do the four members meet in the middle, does one person present an idea that is then developed, or does it vary, song for song and impulse for impulse?

TR: It comes down to parallel tracks. One is primarily Atticus and myself starting with an idea - we were heavily inspired by old Cabaret Voltaire, starting with the sound of old analog sequencers and things, trying to sync up things in conception, and machines working together in concert but not quite able to do so. I think that concept led to experimentation as it proceeded. The other track would be Mariqueen coming up with melodic ideas - sometimes completely unrelated to what we're doing - lyrical concepts and fragments of lyrics that were married to this music. It would often go in a direction that Atticus and I didn't intend it to, and that marriage, that collision, would make it feel a lot different to how a Nine Inch Nails record would feel, or a soundtrack as it evolved.

Your specific work for How to Destroy Angels, as opposed to other activity and projects that you're doing right now - do you find that working in a group form results in something where you're challenging yourself, or is it more an extension of a certain part of yourself? Or is it a mix of both?

TR: Hmm, interesting! This is something that may or may not qualify as an answer for that - when Fincher asked me to work on The Social Network score, and I accepted because he was somebody I respected as a person and as an artist, it was a respectful environment but it was an environment where clearly I was working under him to serve what he wanted to make. That's very different from how Nine Inch Nails operates, where at the end of the day I'm making all the decisions and in that pyramid of power I'm sitting at the top of that, vision-wise, direction-wise, final vote-wise. I found that I really enjoyed being in that respectful environment, not being at the top of the pyramid.

When working with like-minded people on a project that was very interesting, with respect going both ways, it was fun to be in that supporting role. I wasn't thinking that way out of laziness, I was thinking more that it was interesting to be taking direction. That's something I've learned later in life here, that there is something that I responded to in that. When he asked if I could do The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo right after that I said "Yes, I really enjoyed that!"

Coming out of a few years of doing that, I've started to fuck around a bit with Nine Inch Nails stuff, writing music that feels like it could belong in that category, and I found it very invigorating and inspiring because I hadn't done it for a while, and it feels good to be taking the reins.

With How to Destroy Angels, it was more in that center column of working collectively, about realising that it's not all my decision, that I think I would have done it this way, but okay, we've decided to go that way, and discovering that works, that basic collaboration. It's the reason people collaborate in the first place. That had little impact on Nine Inch Nails evolved but now I'm enjoying collaborating in various different forms, while at the same time it's reinvigorating my interest in autonomy as well.

Finally, given all the many different projects you've touched on here and are continuing to work on... Obviously the public are only seeing things from the outside as they're announced or mentioned, like the recently confirmed Beats by Dre project. From the inside, as you look at everything you're doing now - whether public or private for the moment - do you see everything as part of a continuous process, something flowing whether it goes here, or here, or here? Or is it something done in discrete bursts -- now it's this, now it's this, and now it's this? How do you see yourself as a creator with all these things on the boil?

TR: Another in the series of good interesting questions I don't have predetermined answers for because I've answered them before a hundred times! That's good! You're throwing me off my game here, I can't use my sheet of talking points.

In my head, the way I'm seeing it is [that] something changed with me, and I think it was a combination of maturity and getting sober, it had a lot to do with that. A lot of what was prior to that, in the early stages of my career, it was really driven by fear, fear of everything. The act of writing music was cathartic but it was terrifying. It wasn't something I liked to do. I loved the result but getting to that result was a road marked with failures and self-loathing and everything else. Finally getting a song that I felt I was proud of - that reward, that carrot - kept me doing it. That led to, at that time, getting a record deal, getting to be on stage playing music, and that carrot kept me doing it. I was appreciative and I loved doing it, but I hated the process of creation.

That changed. The Downward Spiral had another mark of terror about it: was I ever going to be able to write another song? Was that just a fluke? I loved playing live, but the act of sitting alone in a room and trying to scrape songs that had guts and the brain and feelings, they never came from a place of 'Hey, I feel great, let's write a song!' It was filled with rage and anger and something where I had to get it out somehow, and I found a way to do that and... anyway. As life progressed and I was close to getting sober and being willing to walk away from all those stupid things, to stay alive after the road I went down went to a terrible place, I started dabbling and seeing if I could write music again. And this would be what led into With Teeth and everything beyond.

To my amazement, I found that the act of creation and writing wasn't as terrifying because... I don't know why. I'm not saying I was losing interest in the pain and unpleasantness and things like that, but the process itself wasn't so entangled with self-loathing. That I could sit down and write this thing and 'It sucks, that's okay, no-one has to hear it, I can keep writing more stuff.'

It was a real revelation that I enjoyed the process [of writing music] now, of digging in, rather than loathing it. What this led to - and I think this is coming into answer territory now! - what I've tried to focus in on over the last few years is trying to keep an eye on and reminding myself of what's inspiring: what is the reason I'm doing that, what feels rewarding to work, what feels challenging.

I used to always beat myself up because my idol David Bowie, I'd look at his career through the eyes of someone reading about it, watching it from the distance of time, many writers' takes on the culture of what he did. It seemed as though he mysteriously change - maybe the construction of what he'd built wasn't broken yet, but he'd throw it out because he was building a new one, his new persona or his new look or his new sound. At its peak he could walk away from that and try something new, fearlessly.

When I met him in 1995 when we did the tour together, he said to me right off the bat, "We'd love to go out with Nine Inch Nails, you guys are going to blow us off the stage because I'm not trying what people want to hear. I'm going out with this band, we've made a difficult new record with Eno" - this was the Outside record - "and we're going to focus on that, because that's where my head's at right now. Nobody really wants to hear that, and I know that, but this is what I need to do right now." I remember thinking, "Well, that's kind of stupid, isn't it? But wow." And he was right: he went out and played the show and it wasn't what people wanted to hear, and it stuck with me.

I've beat myself up over the years and I need to try new things, I need to push myself, I need to break the machine, I need to step away from things that feel comfortable to me, and I think I'm still deep in the process of trying that. In the last few years I've tried to put a focus on not just repeating the touring cycle process endlessly, trying and working in different contexts. I tried the film scoring world to see what that was like, and I found that there's great things about it and there's terrible things about it. Working with different bands - the thing with [Dr.] Dre will reveal itself pretty soon, it's not a physical product, it's a platform that feels like it - it was a real challenge to come up with that. Will it work? It may, it may not. But it's something that's a puzzle for me to solve, in and of itself challenging, and it's utilising some skills I have in an unfamiliar and unsafe half of my safety zone kind of way, and it's been interesting. I tried writing a TV show for HBO and it failed, but we tried! It was scary and uncomfortable and lots of meetings, and it thrust me into something that was unfamiliar and it didn't always work.

Thinking about [How To Destroy Angels] - to me it feels complementary. I was seduced by, you could say, the Oscar win, but also more than that the process of working with Fincher and this exotic world of film and Hollywood and being invited into the inner sanctum of that. It was interesting, but I don't see my life going down the path of trying to do a lot of film scores, because most of them are pretty boring anyway, because the films are pretty boring, in a Hollywood world. I'm treating it from the level of "Hey, that was a nice little detour to go down," and I'm hoping to do something like that again, I'm trying to keep things interesting.

At the moment [with] all the stuff on my plate, it feels like although I immerse myself into each one of them [and] I'm locked out to the rest, there's still a bit of something satisfying something in me. There's a piece over here that's scratching that itch, a cohesiveness [due to] really trying to stay focused on things that feel interesting to me, and not resting on my laurels, as I'm tempted to do.

Post-Punk Monk
Dec 10, 2012 1:45pm

I certainly remember my experience with the "Outside" tour. We timed our arrival to miss NIN and as I heard Bowie's band begin playing "Look Back In Anger," we entered the stadium - precisely when almost half of the audience was exiting it! I have to admit that I still hate the "Outside" album. Some of the songs are fantastic, but as a whole, the conceits that drive the album kill it dead in the water for me. The narrative would have been forward thinking in 1982, but not 13 years later. Having read about the artistic processes that Eno employed to make the album, they are more rewarding to read about than the finished product is to listen to.

http://postpunkmonk.wordpress.com
For further ruminations on the Fresh New Sound of Yesterday®

Reply to this Admin

David Jones
Dec 10, 2012 3:24pm

In reply to Post-Punk Monk:

It's a shame I didn't time my reading of the interview to miss your comment.

Reply to this Admin


Dec 10, 2012 3:25pm

Trent's response to Bowie's artistic beligerence - "Well, that's kind of stupid, isn't it?" - summarises what I felt was so wrong about NIN in the "old days". Trent would create incredible records; utterly stunning sound design, emotional power and kaleidescopic textural shift, and all from a very unique angle, but then would go on tour and play a fucking greatest hits set because of that same reluctance to say "hey you know what, I'm the artist here, I don't have to answer to you lot."

The shame of it is that Trent finally seemed to realise that, but only after his process of maturation and sobriety, which to me sucked all the life and the impact out of his music. That last NIN tour had the best setlists of his career, where he finally stopped caring how the audience would respond and actually performed his greatest works (Just Like You Imagined, The Downward Spiral, The Becoming, The Way Out is Through, etc) but yet the albums he was touring to support were so generic and stale, washed clean of any genuine intensity and drafted in a void of standard Reznorisms.

But at least nothing could be as outright awful as With Teeth, which thankfully remains buried in the past... A truly hideous album - almost impossibly terrible! - and with an appopriately awful tour (or three) with the worst touring lineup of his career playing the worst setlists of his career. He's come a long way but I would be surprised if his work ever regained that intensity he had pre-maturity. But best of luck to him, I guess he did the great work then and has earned his place to make whatever he wishes now.

Reply to this Admin

Matt
Dec 10, 2012 5:54pm

In reply to :

To each his own. I don't agree that With Teeth wasn't a good album. I like several tracks on that one a lot: All The Love in the World, You Know What You Are?, The Hand That Feeds, Every Day Is Exactly The Same, Only, Getting Smaller, The Line Begins to Blur, The Line Begins to Blur, Home, Right Where It Belongs and v.2 of that same song. Hearing Dave Grohl's drumming over Trent's songs is worth the price of admission alone.

Reply to this Admin

austy
Dec 10, 2012 8:27pm

anyone else think that "Ice Age" is sort of a NPR ready version of a Swans/Jarboe song? Think the mood of "I Remember Who You Are"... I love that HTDA is named after a song for gay guys to have supertantric sex to...

Reply to this Admin

austy
Dec 10, 2012 8:29pm

oh yeah where the hell do they have Claudia Sarne bound and gagged? I always thought Atticus should bring her out of the cedar box and they should all do an apocalyptic version of Fleetwood Mac's Rumours...

Reply to this Admin

Ryan Clemen
Dec 11, 2012 2:42am

Fantastic questions and the same for the interview. Kudos.

Reply to this Admin

Greg
Dec 11, 2012 10:36am

In reply to Matt:

First up I didn't mean to post that anonymously; I hit enter before I'd put any name or email address above. But anyway_

With Teeth to me was an immensely bitter disappointment having come from an artist whose last release was as devastatingly ingenious as The Fragile. That album was a complete and utter masterwork (give or take Starfuckers and No You Don't) that exposed the apparently limitless creative potential Reznor possessed at the time. It had shown itself on Broken and TDS but as brilliant as they are, they feel like the entree to the stunning main course that is The Fragile.

Fast forward six years to With Teeth and this same guy offers up poor immitations of bad QOTSA, truly dreadful lyrics (not that he had ever been a master of words but this was a new level of bad), piss-weak song structures, generic melodicism and tedious flow. Gone was the mastery of atmosphere, the unique structural inventions, the fresh and unexpected sounds and fascinating integration of song-form and melody into sound design and texture... And worst of all, he had begun to rehash his own sounds but use them to lesser means, and that to me was very sad indeed.

Reply to this Admin

Werner
Dec 11, 2012 3:01pm

In reply to Greg:

You know what?

I like With Teeth better than The Fragile altough I really dug the latter one when it came out (I still like it). Just because you don't like WT doesn't mean it has to be considered a bad record in the history books.

Reply to this Admin

Kat Duke
Dec 11, 2012 5:06pm

In reply to Post-Punk Monk:

As a lifelong BOWIE follower I remember OUTSIDE very differently from many. The whole aesthetic of that period was perfectly in tune with where I was at that time. I'd got heavily into NIN a few years before with Pretty Hate Machine and had delved well and truly into industrial music and am of a dark nature anyway, so the twisted atmosphere of OUTSIDE and the idea of murder as art and BOWIE doing photo shoots with scalpels and so on resonated perfectly with my mental landscape. Creatively I think OUTSIDE was a triumph and to this day I can't fault the music in any way. For me the album is one great track after another, with evocative narrative stringing the work together to form a disquieting but beautiful tapestry. Were gun to be placed to temple, I would have to say that THE HEART'S FILTHY LESSON is possibly my favourite BOWIE track of all time, and god knows there's extraordinary competition. I flew to NYC to see the two shows near there and they were the best of my life. The tales of people leaving in droves after NIN had finished are grossly exaggerated and, as Post-Punk Monk exemplifies, some people came in time for BOWIE specifically so numbers were not all that reduced for the main show in fact. It seems to me that a lot of people wanted to dislike OUTSIDE and the team-up with NIN for the tour. BOWIE fans were shocked and NIN fans were narrow minded .... though only at first. I know of many NIN fans who were converted to BOWIE through this which is as I would have expected. BOWIE working with NIN seemed a perfect artistic marriage to me and many NIN fans came to appreciate that. BOWIE's genius is often exercised best when pulling together the best in others.

Reply to this Admin

julio
Dec 12, 2012 4:42am

great interview. on the OUTSIDE conversation, well, i like this record a lot because it sounded heavely influenced by young gods and, in my mind, was a great breathing block on a period that i consinder of slow and steady decadense for bowie.I see nin albuns as artifacts who reflect the state of mind of trent at each time, so for me THE FRAGILE made sense on the moment it was made, WITH TEETH too. honestly, i found this last to be a record i remember much more fondly than the former, maybe because i like a lot the great gary numan influence who shows deeper in WT. But you know, it's subjective and the good part is that mr. reznor is healthy and happy, busy as ever and trying his best to come with the best music he can do. maybe soon he'll do his OUTSIDE too!

Reply to this Admin

Post-Punk Monk
Jan 18, 2013 2:59pm

In reply to Kat Duke:

Here's my perspective, and if I came off a flippant, that's my fault. I was into industrial music from the late 70s. TG and Cab Volt were amazing. By the time it hit the mainstream in the early 90s, I was in a place where I could grow sick of it. I had seen NIN on their first tour, opening for Peter Murphy. It didn't move me to buy the album, but I did buy the "Head Like A Hole" single. By 1995 I weeded out what I typified by that time as the industrial also rans out of my collection. The 4 NIN releases [HLAH, Sin, Broken, Fixed] as well as the Skinny Puppy and a great deal of KMFDM got traded in. I was just too old for that sort of adolescent angst set to music. That's not to say I couldn't appreciate harsh music. Killing Joke released my favorite album of 1990 with "Extremities, Dirt + Various Repressed Emotions." That represented a peak of the band for me but the difference between that music and NIN is that it seemed to be issued [however violently] from a mature point of view that I was not finding in NIN and that ilk as a person who had grown up with industrial sounds and was now in my 30s. At nearly 50 I can still love my Rough Trade Cab Volt releases. Their artistic brief [examining and exposing the control process] is not adolescent in any way to me. But I draw the line at their house period! And without Mallinder the group lost its soul.

http://postunkmonk.wordpress.com
For further rumination on the Fresh New Sound Of Yesterday®

Reply to this Admin

Skrell
Jan 24, 2013 2:01pm

In reply to :

You literally read my mind but expressed it better than I could, well said!

Reply to this Admin