The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Film Reviews

Scientology Fiction? The Master Reviewed
Craig Terlino , October 30th, 2012 04:52

Our Boston, MA correspondent Craig Terlino ponders the basis of modern US cinema great Paul Thomas Anderson's sixth feature, which opens as a 70mm presentation at the Odeon West End in London this Friday, before going on regular nationwide theatrical release from November 16

Add your comment »

Towards the end of World War II, the US Army produced a series of films observing and forecasting the psychological effects of combat. One of these was Let There Be Light, made by Hollywood legend John Huston, who was at that time serving with the Signal Corps. It documented wounded soldiers undergoing experimental interviews and hypnosis, with the hope of rehabilitation and a return to civilian life. Huston filmed these therapy sessions right up until the men were discharged from their medical attention. Many of them were suffering from psychosis or paralysis, and most all were affected by some level of severe anxiety disorder.

Now viewable online at the National Film Preservation Foundation, Let There Be Light was decades ahead of its time, showing innovative measures in dealing with and understanding what we today call post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Deemed too controversial by the censors in 1946, it wasn't screened for a public audience until 1980. Sadly, the need for understanding the trauma that soldiers have to endure was not a priority in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War (or indeed Vietnam).

Let There Be Light is the hidden backbone of the plot in Paul Thomas Anderson's drama The Master. The documentary inspired elements of character development and narrative in the new movie, while Anderson took parts of his dialogue word-for-word from the original therapy sessions. The Master also reworks a few unused scenes from its writer-director's previous feature There Will Be Blood (2007), which was itself greatly influenced by Huston's 1948 classic The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre.

The Master is the story of erstwhile sailor Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), a loner stricken with PTSD, who struggles with a great deal of rage and alcoholism. Once back home, Freddie tries to fit into place in 1950s America, all the while processing his existence in a postwar climate.

Whether he's jobbing as a department store photographer or attempting to make moonshine, Quell's thirst for booze is prevalent, fuelling his violent and unpredictable behavior. He eventually puts the necessity of employment behind him, throws caution to the wind and becomes a drifter.

That's when he meets Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), a character based on L Ron Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology. In The Master, Dodd is the leader of a movement called 'The Cause'. Seeking some kind of solace, the troubled navy veteran gains interest and companionship from Dodd, and the pair set out on the road to spread their philosophy. However, afflicted by anger and drink dependency, Freddie grows disheartened and has to make the choice between going it alone or committing to 'The Cause' - an imperative decision with regards to his full acceptance.

The Master explores various themes: the alluring values of redemption, the struggles of rehabilitation and, at its core, self-destructive behaviour. This is a tale about commitments, false hopes and, moreover, individualism. But to gather all that you need to delve into the mood of the characters. The plot is almost clouded; invisible at times and, arguably, only accessible by way of knowing about the movie's subject matter and development beforehand (hence the recommendation to watch Let There Be Light).

In the United States, there have been lots of negative reviews and many of them understandable. Here we have a heavyweight director, known as one of our most celebrated contemporary dramatists, whose output - although subtle - is enriched with substance. His new picture comes along - again with subtleties - and leaves very little to bite into, but much to ponder.

Anderson fans might want to try approaching this one without expectations or the need for resolve. The performances are explosive, and being shot on 70mm gives the film a majestic texture and grand dimension. It may well be that many people disliked The Master, Scientologists included, because they simply didn't get it. Others have felt let down because they expected an epic or kaleidoscopic storyline. Nobody wants to admit that they don't understand something from one of their favorite directors; it's a tough reaction to blurt out.

At the end of the day, this movie is intended for those who seek nuance - for those intrigued by the neuropsychiatric conflict represented by Freddie Quell, and the horrors of war and what it does to men's minds. It could be key to go back for a second viewing if first impressions fail you. Paul Thomas Anderson's latest work is designed for those who like to peel back several layers. As such, it's perhaps best to disregard what critics have said upon the film's initial release. Without a doubt, The Master is one cinematic challenge.

If you love our features, news and reviews, please support what we do with a one-off or regular donation. Year-on-year, our corporate advertising is down by around 90% - a figure that threatens to sink The Quietus. Hit this link to find out more and keep on Black Sky Thinking.

Jeff
Oct 30, 2012 6:27pm

I truly loved this movie when I saw it at Kendall Square Cinema in Cambridge, MA. It left me with many questions, but in a good way. A great film to pore over and discuss in the company of friends.

Reply to this Admin

Apop
Oct 31, 2012 1:02am

Have yet to catch it here in the States but am looking forward to doing so. Wish it was being presented here in my city on 70mm - that's a rarity these days (i think the last I saw was Branagh's Hamlet and that had to have been, what, 15 years ago?).

Also, I'll always show up to support the closest male equivalent to Meryl Streep, and that would be Philip Seymour Hoffman...a remarkable actor.

Reply to this Admin

Joel
Oct 31, 2012 3:28pm

I absolutely loved this film as well, despite, like Apop, not being able to view it in 70mm in my city. Thank-you for the background re. the Huston film. I've yet to watch it, but I can already see that doing so, and then returning to The Master again will add a whole new set of resonances. I feel like that's what successful reviews do - they place a work in context or suggest antecedents or influences, and you have done just that. Thanks.

Reply to this Admin

james
Oct 31, 2012 6:08pm

A precise and damning indictment of the fraud that is Dianetics.

Reply to this Admin

craig
Nov 2, 2012 6:33pm

In reply to Joel:

Thanks Joel. That was my intent, glad this got received that way.

Reply to this Admin