Maggieography: Why The Thatcher Biopic Should Be Resisted With Prejudice
David Stubbs
, January 13th, 2012 08:49
Meryl Streep's latest Oscar-seeking vehicle The Iron Lady purports to show Margaret Thatcher's 'human side'. David Stubbs is not for turning

Some critical reaction to The Iron Lady has it that although the film is light on politics, it draws its strength from Meryl Streep's virtuoso performance as Thatcher, which surely would have to be more human and engaging than the snarling latex caricature of Spitting Image yore if she's to be in with a shot at an Oscar. As the notes as my local cinema put it, "Thatcher's will to eschew expectation and prejudice to become the first female leader of the Western world makes for inspiring cinema, whatever your view on her policies." This call to bury old hatchets and contemplate Thatcher the rounded and exquisitely Streeped woman seems pernicious and less apolitical than it might appear. It comes at a time when plans are afoot for Thatcher to be given a state funeral – the first PM to be thus honoured since Churchill. But whereas Churchill, despite rabidly right-wing views which at one point saw him call for compulsory sterilisation of the lower orders was indubitably a unifying figure in wartime, Thatcher never was. Many of us refuse to accept the protocol that being a British PM she cannot have been truly awful and are suspicious of attempts to cast her as an icon to whom, now that she is is the twilight of her years, we must maturely bow our heads in acknowledgement.
Of course, the filmmakers would urge you, for obvious reasons, to "Make up your own minds!" but this feels like one of those occasions where one should resist with prejudice, rather than enrich the producers of this dubious project. But Black Sky Thinking requires food for thought, so down to the multiplex to see the thing, if only – who knows? – so that others don't have to.
The film begins with a scene in which an elderly Lady Thatcher wanders out to her local convenience store to buy milk, is unrecognised and barged aside by an ironically neo-Thatcherite suit barking into a mobile before making her purchase. Turns out she's evaded her minders, and husband Denis (Jim Broadbent) wryly chides her for getting her police detail into trouble. Only it soon emerges that this Denis (who died some years ago) is a figment of her addled imagination, with whom she will converse throughout the film. These opening scenes are, initially, bleakly affecting, as we see Lady Thatcher forced to live with the reality of her declining powers and faculties, with only her long term memories and senile delusions for company.
These are the scenes which have upset Thatcher's Tory admirers, who feel they are disrespectful towards their Dear Leader and invasive of her dignity, especially as she is still among us. However, as the film proceeds, flashing back across her life commencing with her wartime days as Margaret Roberts, the grocer's daughter, you understand why they are so extensively included by the filmmakers: to vaseline into the Thatcher story some much-needed poignancy. Because boy, does it need it. And if in this case it means, hey, she's grown very old and a bit sad like people do, well, that'll have to do.
Granted, you feel a little for her as a young prospective candidate and later newly arrived MP, coping with the ingrained sexism and condescension of the Tory establishment and the Houses of Parliament. But this doesn't last long, as you realise that by the age of 15, in the thrall of her Alderman father whose trite, narrowcast homilies about self-help rather than 'handouts' she eats up with wide-eyed ardour, her Ladybird book worldview of thrift, hardworking shopkeepers, friendly bobbies and incorrigible bad sorts has been set obdurately in stone for life. She's no more pervious to dissenting voices, or challenges to her stubbornly twinset mindset, in youth or middle age then she is in her dotage.
This, of course, is promoted as her great virtue, and we see her hurtle - compact, eyes blazing and uncompromising - to success. And it's in the familiar period of her political fame that the problems really begin. After an unfortunate appearance as a Minister at the dispatch box when she is accused of 'screeching' by her Labour opposite number, Tory grandees try to make her over. But, apart from lowering her voice a semitone or so, they don't really succeed. Even toned down, Thatcher as PM still comes across as a brutally anachronistic Aunt Sally figure, a Wodehouseian or Wildeian Aunt let loose on the 1980s, not for turning.
All of which is a problem for both the filmmakers and for Meryl Streep. She does a tremendous impersonation of Thatcher, for sure, but we can tell this because we remember, with a shudder, that Thatcher existed. Had this been made up, we'd be lampooning Streep for her hideously hackneyed, cartoon parody of Tory womanhood. Where is the dramatic arc, the character development, the nuance, the capacity for reflection, the interior life, the learning and the consequences - all the stuff she'd expect to sink her teeth into were this a fictional character working their way through three acts? Thatcher is simply Thatcher throughout: determined, myopic, unrepentant. This eventually becomes wearing on the viewer, looking for some point of engagement. She's especially obnoxious in the scenes involving the Falklands conflict, berating one of her male minions who dares even to think of pointing out she has never been to war. "I've done battle every day of my life!" she announces, oblivious to the difference between someone with a personal relish for adversarialism and the tragedy of warfare.
We're swept through the '80s at an unseemly brisk, staccato pace; riots, war, IRA bombs, the miners' strike, Union Flag-soaked election triumphs, more riots, and then, finally, her undoing as her teeth-grating hectoring and domineering are seen, eventually, to be too much. This results in some ridiculous compressions, such as the victory in the Falklands appearing to unlock a boom in the UK economy. And yet, you just want it to pass as soon as possible just to be relieved from the repugnance. Hence the relief when she finally snaps, "Sink it!" in the situation room as the Belgrano steams away. Yes, yes, drown those wretched, retreating sailors; whatever it takes to get us closer to the end of this damn movie.
The historical flashbacks are depicted from Thatcher's perspective, which mostly involves scenes of the unwashed not-one-of-us brigade smashing up things or shouting mutely at her through her car window, or plummy male wets crowding round and talking down to her, urging compromise, only to be skittled by the resolve of a strong woman who would sooner skank on Alderman Roberts's grave than back down. The grievances of the opposition are articulated – in a brief Michael Foot tirade, in background, truncated radio broadcasts and the occasional Sergeant Wilson-esque murmur from Geoffrey Howe – but it's the bare minimum. Anyone who did not know the history might assume all this rioting was the convulsions of a torpid Britain resisting its strong medicine, all these dissenting voices the mere harrumphing of a sexist, condescending establishment. Denis Thatcher's ghost is her only real match, and occasionally he plays a Jiminy Cricket-type role in her imaginary conversations with her in widowhood. He pricks her conscience; but only to say things like "You're drinking too much", rather than, say, "You presided over the dismantling of the UK's manufacturing base, sold off the country's commonly owned silverware to a bunch of money-grubbing, pinstriped opportunists, practically eliminated the country's social housing stock and eroded the welfare state by unleashing the worst of which the British people are capable – fear, ruthless greed and small-minded loathing, racism, xenophobia and homophobia – adding insult to injury by administering all this with a sickly, acrid, old-fashioned dose of castor oil moralism. It is just that you rot in senile purgatory and die a lonely death." Generally, Denis encouraged rather than tempered her delusions of righteousness.
"We are governed by people who care more about feelings than thoughts and ideas," snorts Thatcher late on in the movie, scoring a rare point. But The Iron Lady pulls out every stop and trick, stacks everything up as best it can in order to make us feel something, anything, for the woman with whom the viewer is forced to spend 90 intimate minutes in a darkened room. There are frequent, heavily lacquered applications of sentimentally lachrymose orchestral music. Mark Thatcher is not represented on screen at all, which is just as well, for watching her dote on that pillar of toss would only make her seem more repellent (here is a woman only capable of engaging with one out of two parents and one out of her two children). They try to suggest that she was a feminist role model but are forced, honestly, to concede that it was her own emancipation and advance in which she was interested, not women generally, virtually none of whom entered her cabinet.
Furthermore, she is depicted as a lone warrior, the one against the many, drawing solely on her heroic resolve to prevail. We know this is untrue. What we are not shown is that an establishment with a right-wing bent was four square behind her: business, the military and, not least, the press, including the ghastly apparatus of Rupert Murdoch, whom the filmmakers choose to ignore altogether. The idea that she advanced through sheer personal strength of character alone is a nonsense: she was a convenient wrecking ball for wider, invisible, abstract and malign forces. Barbara Castle, from the left, could never have made such an advance. Chris Mullin's A Very British Coup, meanwhile, in which Harry Perkins, an ex-steel worker, becomes Prime Minister gives a probably accurate indication of what were to happen if a leftist equivalent of Thatcher were to enter Number 10 and how the press, military and financial institutions would respond under those circumstances.
The Iron Lady set itself an invidious task. Who knows, they might have done the best of all possible jobs given the time and brief, although this film will prove neither satisfactory to the Left, for all its gross omissions, or to the Right, for its morbid dwelling on her old age. But the story skimpily told here might have been better suited to an epic, six or 12 part series, featuring other stories, other characters, aspects and strata of 1980s society that allowed the more complex picture to unfurl. For this is the thing: the '80s, and Thatcherism, were far larger than the rather small, psychologically uninteresting and obdurately pathetic figure of Thatcher herself. Any day, week or month now she will die and there will be ding-dong celebrations from some, nauseatingly enforced grieving from others. But what hasn't died is the legacy of the era over which she presided, whose greatest trick may have been rhetorical: "there is no alternative." The schisms and open wounds left in those ravaging years we are supposed now to accept as the natural running rivers and gorges of New Britain. There were, are and always will be alternatives. And one of them is to give this desperately confected treatment of a figure whose very repugnance served as comic distraction from what was really being done in the 1980s, a wide berth.
Jan 13, 2012 3:16pm
if she gets a state funeral I will be the first to riot, right after a few warm up stretches natch..
Jan 13, 2012 5:28pm
Amazing.
Is this the same Mr Stubbs that used to do Mr Amusing in Melody Maker? I'd like to see Mr Amusing have a go Thatch,
x
Jan 13, 2012 6:06pm
At last, an article that sums up my thoughts on this movie and no doubt the thoughts of many others.
Jan 13, 2012 7:10pm
What a well considered analysis of the film and Thatcher's place in history this is. Let's be honest, the concerns that wanted this film made [neither yours or mine, I'd wager] picked the director of "Mamma Mia!" for a reason, didn't they?
Jan 13, 2012 8:05pm
i cant think of anyone i know who would actually want to watch this.all seems like a bad dream when you think back on the time
Jan 13, 2012 8:14pm
You do realise I'm going to have to see it to decide if you were right?
Jan 13, 2012 9:04pm
Have you ever thought that maybe we could draw a line between our perception of the political figure Thatcher and Phyllida Lloyd's take on the human being Margaret. In fact, in all interviews both Meryl and Phyllida repeatedly emphasized that it is NOT a biography - it's a study of the personality, of the complicated nature of a female leader and the controversy which, I agree, her character has always been charged with. What it is NOT is a documentary. So even though exquisitely written this piece oversimplifies the goal of the movie and politicises a deeply psychological view this movie has managed to offer.
Phyllida Lloyd: "I immediately saw that it’s not a political film. It’s almost Shakespearean, the story of a great leader who is both tremendous and flawed in all kinds of ways. It’s a story of power and a crash from power and what happens when someone whose life has been absolutely bursting to fullness with their work is suddenly brought to an end."
Jan 13, 2012 9:19pm
The Left's hypocrisy knows no bounds. Roughly about six weeks ago you were crying "outrage" when Clarkson made a gag about "shooting" strikers. "Apologise" or "sack him" you cried. Yet, somehow, in your tiny little minds, saying this: "It is just that you rot in senile purgatory and die a lonely death", in relation to a 86 year old woman with dementia is acceptable and even funny. Now I won't ask you to retract the vile statement because I'm a libertarian and will defend your right to say it, but I just wanted to shame you a little.
Jan 13, 2012 10:39pm
In reply to Enlightened:
Enlightened, normally I'd agree with you, but Mrs Thatcher is no lady; she is The Dark Lord Beelzebub in disguise, and has been put on this earth to wreak havoc, misery and evil across the land. Upon the day of her death, his majesty will simply go through a Dr Who style regeneraton, and return to earth in some other, equally hideous manifestation.
Jan 14, 2012 12:44am
It's interesting that this piece of propaganda - sorry, this apolitical character study comes out as the revolution she began nears completion in the West. It's a shame she lived long enough for her brain to deteriorate.
Jan 14, 2012 2:02am
I had a sneaking suspicion that this movie wouldn't be worth the popcorn and ticket cost. Thanks for confirming.
Jan 14, 2012 2:46am
Best review of this movie I've read. But also one of the most eloquent reviews I've ever read! Billiant!
Jan 14, 2012 5:32pm
In reply to Max:
Max, noooooooooooooooooooooooo! please dont joke about that! I feel a prolapse coming on...
Jan 14, 2012 5:51pm
Please add me to the 'ding-dong celebrations' waiting list.
Jan 14, 2012 5:56pm
and a suitably harrowing image to go with the article. I cannot imagine why anyone would want to go and see this movie. an idea almost as 'orrible as the ogre herself.
Jan 14, 2012 11:16pm
I cannot understand why any right minded person should pay good money to be reminded of what a Selfish,Egotistical Bitch Thatcher was.
The woman destroyed the manufacturing industry of out country.
On the day she dies there will be many comments made and views
expressed in the Media.I suspect many of them will be good riddance.If the tories try to give this self serving obnoxious
bitch a State Funeral I don't think they have any idea how many votes this will cost them.
This woman is reviled by many more people whose lives she ruined
than the Torie can imagine.
Jan 15, 2012 3:27am
Whenever, during sexual intercourse as a lad, I was about to 'pop', I would cojour the image of Thatcher to keep the wolf from the door and it worked a fucking charm every time. True story.
Jan 15, 2012 3:30am
So, I might add, she was good for something after all. Try it out.
Jan 15, 2012 8:35am
Great piece, you would have to have a heart of stone not to snigger at her living hell. "the medicine is tough, but the patient requires it"
Jan 15, 2012 12:02pm
I say give her a state funeral now, down a disused coalmine - I'll chip in.
Jan 16, 2012 4:13am
Good article. I liked the film enormously. Hated the politics and at the time hated the woman. But the film is great. It doesn't set out to analyse or dissect the changes, the mistakes, the riots or the terrible war. It presents some of the experiences of the time from the perspective of an old person with dementia. I found it very moving and poignant. Not in the same way as the film 'Away from her' with Julie Christie which depicted the change in a close intimate relationship caused by dementia and was so affecting, but moving in the sense that it was sad to see someone who had struggled to be at the top, now isn't, and doesn't remember what she had for breakfast probably. It was also an example of Meryl Streep's superb acting and capabilities. There isn't much call for roles for older women and this one is a treat. I was engaged from start to finish and it made me want to read more and remember more - before I too am sitting alone with not much around me.
Jan 16, 2012 4:30am
In reply to Enlightened:
1) Don't tell me what I think, assface. I've never met "the Left" and so I've never heard him/her espouse those two views you claim s/he holds. More to the point, when has *the author of this article* expressed those views about Clarkson?
2) Actually there is nothing remotely contradictory about the two opinions you mention. It is entirely consistent to believe that Jeremy Clarkson ought to be sacked for some of his more unpleasant comments (as it happens, I don't believe that)
Jan 16, 2012 4:33am
In reply to Loztralia:
(oops)
...and also have equally unpleasant views towards Margaret Thatcher (I'm more ambivalent on that one). Here's what you miss: it's possible to believe that Clarkson is entitled to believe whatever crap he wants, yet not to want to allow him the platform afforded by a national public service broadcaster to express them. Simple, isn't it?
Jan 16, 2012 9:43am
Absolutely brilliant.
Mr. Agreeable for her funeral pls.
Jan 17, 2012 9:04am
Haven't you heard? This is exactly the kind of film Mr. Cameron wants us to make - safe, barely artistic January box office certs that eat up awards while offering the winners version of history and sentimentalising the Victorian institutions that are still in control of this country.
Jan 17, 2012 1:27pm
No money to pay for the bitch to thrown down the mine.
Jan 18, 2012 11:44am
The only real hypocrisy is the idea that we shouldn't support this film (and only because of its subject matter, it's not like the money goes to Thatcher herself) and yet there's an article that proclaims that we need to save British cinema.
Mar 18, 2012 1:26pm
Fucking brits, from Windscape to the wind beneath your garments, you're a bunch of looting, miscreant vagrants.
You live on an island with brown shit water, dirge, overcast skies, and wet coldness that matches your putrid souls. and rotting teeth. You get what you pay for, and what you vote for.
An empty island with an equally empty history.
Please, bring on the next plague.
Mar 18, 2012 1:27pm
Fucking brits, from Windscape to the wind beneath your garments, you're a bunch of looting, miscreant vagrants.
You live on an island with brown shit water, dirge, overcast skies, and wet coldness that matches your putrid souls. and rotting teeth. You get what you pay for, and what you vote for.
An empty island with an equally empty history.
Please, bring on the next plague.
















Goldblade
The National
Vår
The Memory Band
The Focus Group
Neon Neon
Jan 13, 2012 2:39pm
Marvellous!
Reply to this Admin