The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Rock's Backpages

Classic Interview With Freddie Mercury From Rock's Backpages
The Quietus , December 2nd, 2009 12:16

The Quietus has unequivocal love for Queen, but it's an affection which hasn't always been shared by the rock press. Just witness this spat between the NME and Freddie Mercury from 1977

Add your comment »

Interview by Tony Stewart, NME, June 1977

FREDDIE MERCURY has always liked to dance the Millionaire's Waltz. There's a story about him, dating back to his days as an impoverished student, which illustrates that even at that time he had grand aspirations for a luxurious existence. It was before Queen were formed and he was running a stall in Kensington Market with the delicately pretty drummer, Roger Taylor.

Apparently the venture was not a tremendous financial success and it perturbed Freddie that he would be unable to afford a taxi to take him home.

According to fable he was so reluctant to undergo the indignities of public transport that he secretly sold Taylor's jacket to pay his own cabfare.

Mercury doesn't actually deny this story, but neither does he admit its authenticity.

"You'd be surprised how much of it is exaggerated and blown up by the press just to make good copy," he explains, his fingers vigorously pruning his hair, as if in search of nits, as he relaxes on the patio of his manager's Knightsbridge home. "I would give them a bit of spice and they would add all the trimmings.

"My lifestyle and this very precocious nature was blown out of all proportion. But the media created a lot more than I could give. I was prepared to live with it, and it was up to me to make sure I had one foot firmly on the ground. I feel I have.

"It's strategy. One has to use it to one's best advantage, and I feel ummm..." Suddenly he breaks off, seemingly at a loss for words.

"Darling, if everything you read in the press about me was true then I wouldn't be sitting here talking to you today, because I would be so worried about my ego. Actually, if it was all accurate, I would have burnt myself out by now. I really would have."

But you do appreciate the mystique which has developed around you. "I think I need it. I like all that. It's my character. Certainly I'm a flamboyant person. I like to live life. I certainly work hard for it, and I want to have a good time. Don't deny me that. It might not come again and I want to enjoy myself a little.

"I hope," he adds, tilting his head and quietly smirking, "that when you better yourself in your profession you enjoy yourself too."


THAT HE agreed to do this interview in the first place was, in fact, something of a surprise, and the confrontation undoubtedly started with some mutual hostility.

My recent report of the Hamburg concert on their European tour had predictably not been received warmly in the Queen camp. And Mercury had taken exception to being described as a "rock 'n' roll spiv" who used the band "as a vehicle for an elaborate exhibition of narcissism". The basis of my criticism was that more importance was afforded their visual, than their musical presentation. And, simply, Mercury had led them over the top with his self-indulgence, to the detriment of the group performance.

His answer is to make me feel as uncomfortable as possible when we meet. Firstly by insisting that his bodyguard, an intimidating bulk of muscle, is present, and secondly by his own attitude towards me. Seemingly he is determined that I should feel subordinate to him.

"I remember," he opens, "speaking to you three or four years ago. That right? So you're still working for NME? Don't they have such a thing as...aha...promotion? Life is not treating you very well, is it?"

Perfunctory replies, however, do not deter him.

"I would have thought," he adds lightly, "that since the last time I met you, if you had any go by now you should have become...aha...editor of The Times or something."

Well Fred, it was offered, but you know how it is.

"Tart," he simpers quietly.

Realising his game of psychological one-upmanship is having little effect, he then decides to bring my critical ability into dispute by insisting that in concert Queen are trying to broaden the bounds of rock music. That's why, he argues, he has recently had an identical copy of a Nijinsky ballet costume made. He's not just posing, he declares, but using various artefacts of different cultures to make the band better and more entertaining.

"Which," he adds indignantly, "you don't seem to agree upon. But we shall press further on this point. You don't leave any room for progression, do you?"

Well, I'm not sure if it is a progression, which is the basis of my criticism.

"Stuff your criticism," he comments petulantly. "I think you look upon things with a very narrow view. I feel you restrict yourself by working in a very small framework. Have you ever reviewed a ballet show?"

No. I shouldn't think I would be qualified to do so either.

"What makes you think you're qualified to do rock 'n' roll? Do you need degrees to do it? If ballet should suddenly infiltrate rock 'n' roll," he confidently predicts, "you would be the first to jump on it, wouldn't you?

"You don't seem to realise that all these things are so close. Maybe not so much the dancing part, but in the presentation they are. And they (ballet dancers) come and see rock 'n' roll shows, you'd be surprised to see what's going on."

Well, if I ever see Margot Fonteyn down The Rainbow, I'll buy her a pint.

"It's all forms of art," he elaborates heatedly, "so I don't see why it should be that limiting; especially in this day and age when people are doing so many different things.

"You don't seem to grasp or have any sense of actually err...I just don't think you know anything about style and artistry. Maybe they're beyond you, therefore you can't grasp them, therefore you dismiss 'em.

"I think that's really a poor show from your point of view.

"It doesn't worry me a bit! I just feel that you have terribly missed the point."

BUT AS HE continues to express his indignation it becomes clear that his invective is far from personal, and he is merely criticising the British press and venting his fury on me as the nearest representative at hand.

The Americans, he observes, don't have the same kind of prejudices.

"If they can do it, why the fuck can't people over here?" he asks angrily. "You're too narrowminded. You're the bloody arrogant sods that just don't want to learn. You don't want to be told anything. You feel you know it all before it's even happened."

These ill-advised, inaccurate, not to mention unkind words, cannot be ignored. Mercury needs putting straight.

At a time, I tell him, of great musical change – when the New Wave is at the very least causing us all to re-examine our rock credo – Queen are alienating themselves from this very culture. Worst of all they appear to be guilty of the cardinal sin: believing in their own myth.

A rock gig is no longer the ceremonial idolisation of Star by Fans.

That whole illusion, still perpetrated by Queen, is quickly being destroyed.

And in this iconoclastic atmosphere there is nothing more redundant, or meaningless, that a posturing old ballerina toasting the audience, as Mercury does, with "May you all have champagne for breakfast."

"You hated that, didn't you?" He replies with a light laugh, colouring slightly. "I loved it, and I think that people love it. It's part of entertainment.

"God! You haven't an ounce of artistry in your veins really.

"What do you know about showbiz? That's the way certain things happen, can be done, and that's the path we've sort of allotted ourselves. That's the way we want to do it.

"Can you imagine," he asks, his voice shaking at the thought of such a horrifying prospect, "doing the sort of songs that we've written, like 'Rhapsody' or 'Somebody To Love', in jeans with absolutely no presentation? [Precisely. – Ed.]

"You don't seem to realise that the kind of public who come to see us love that kind of thing. They want a showbiz type of thing. In fact they're the ones who put you on the pedestal.

"Why do you think people like David Bowie and Elvis Presley have been so successful?"

Because they give their audiences champagne for breakfasts.

"Coz they're what the people want. They want to see you rush off in the limousines. They get a buzz."

When he was younger, he explains, the myth was part of the rock 'n' roll excitement. Performers were untouchables, he suggests, and there was a thrill in being unable, for example, to get near Hendrix after a show.

"What do you expect? Somebody to go round and have tea with the front row? Break this barrier we've put across?

"God! You've missed the whole point.

"I'd like you to tell me how we [Queen] could better it if you think there's too much of a barrier."

Sack Muscles.

The thought occured to me, but remained unaired. Why involve yourself in such bitchy rhetoric; and anyway I had no intention of inviting the bodyguard's fist to play bloodbath with my face.

WHAT IS more significant is that on-stage Queen are no longer, ahem, majestic, and their last album A Day At The Races was mostly bland and insubstantial, musically and lyrically. Quite why they should have lost the artistic momentum they possessed on Sheer Heart Attack and A Night At The Opera is bewildering.

But surprisingly this is an observation Mercury partly concedes.

"It's very difficult," he acknowledges, "especially after five albums, to come up with totally outrageous and original things."

Since our initial eventful, sometimes bitter, confrontation he has now mellowed slightly. Various complaints from both of us had been extensively voiced over the splendid fresh salmon lunch provided by the kitchen of Queen's manager, John Reid. On returning to the interview Mercury's dudgeon had diminished and he appears to be more rational and less sensitive to journalistic admonishment.

"I think you've slightly misjudged us in what we're trying to do," he suggests mildly. "You've probably written about all our bad qualities and veered away from the point.

"I am not," he emphasises, "using the band as a vehicle. I like to think we're exploring different areas, and it's also where our interests lie.

"I'm into this ballet thing, and that's why I'm trying to put across this Nijinsky costume; and trying to put across our music in a more artistic manner than before.

"A lot of people just dismiss it and say I'm wearing a silly little outfit, rather than being critical and saying that formal ballet may not be quite right for rock 'n' roll."

Why is it so important for you to radically broaden the scope of rock into other cultural areas?

"It's just," he answers simply, "a logical thing. I want to do different things. I don't want to keep playing the same formula over and over again, otherwise you just go insane. I don't want to become stale. I want to be creative."

And dressing up like a party clown is being creative?

"I want to put my music across, as far as entertaining is concerned, with everything: costumes and lights.

"It's a progression with the music and I felt, for want of better words, if our music was getting mature and sophisticated so should our stage act. Our songs needed a different kind of interpretation, and that's what we're trying to do.

"WE CERTAINLY like being excessive. I know it's a nasty word for you, but we do, because a lot of our music is that. There is nothing more disheartening than if the music was so overpowering and we didn't have anything to go with it. It would just be a compromise.

"We have found," he quietly boasts, "that our music at times is so outlandish, so important – call it what you want – that we needed to do it on stage.

"If there are other ways of doing it, my God, you tell me so."

Mercury's convinced, as he's briefly mentioned, that he is a misunderstood cultural innovator.

Inevitably this line leads back to his feelings of animosity and resentment towards the British press, and almost in passing he mentions that in the UK, A Day At The Races was received unfavourably. Critics noted, he says, that there had not been much of a development musically.

This, of course, is the crux of the matter. If they are artistically on the decline, which certainly seems to be the case, then how will his interests in other art forms be beneficial? After all, if they lose their musical impetus will there be any satisfaction pirouetting in an empty hall?

Mercury may be narcissistic enough to believe there will, because he fondly talks about "getting very involved with this showbusiness type of thing and this sort of cabaret-ish...stroke, ballet thing."

But what does it mean to you?

"I dunno," he answers blankly. "I certainly want to write better songs. It's my career, it's my project in life."

And he thinks these extra-curricular activities have helped him towards composing better material.

"Certainly!" He proudly proclaims. "Something like 'Bohemian Rhapsody' didn't just come out of thin air. I did a bit of research, although it was tongue in cheek and it was mock opera. Why not? I certainly wasn't saying I was an opera fanatic and I knew everything about it."

He'd heard Gilbert and Sullivan though. But he chooses to ignore the comment.

"This is it. I just like to think that we've come through rock 'n' roll, call it what you like, and there are no barriers: it's open. Especially now when everybody's putting their feelers out and they want to infiltrate new territories. This is what I've been trying to do for years.

"Nobody's incorporated ballet. I mean," he laughs smugly, "it sounds so outrageous and so extreme, but I know there's going to come a time when it's commonplace."

BUT WHAT significance will it have for audiences? Call me a cultural clot Fred, but like me, most rock fans probably think Nijinsky was a famous racehorse.

"That's very good," he chuckles, kindly indulgent. "Yes, I agree. It's something I'll try and if it doesn't work, well it doesn't work. It's something that David Bowie did to an extent: bringing a kind of theatre into rock."

Indeed. But Bowie's Ziggy Stardust character was of crucial importance to the musical concept.

"Forget David Bowie now," he comments, effortlessly dismissing the argument, "because this is totally different.

"A lot of the music does lend itself to the kind of styles I'm putting across. I just felt I needed a more graceful approach. It's very close to the music we're doing. But I know it might be hard to grasp at this moment."

Not to put a too fine a point on it, wouldn't you get into costumes even if it was not an enhancement of the music, purely because you're an irrepressible exhibitionist?

"I think it's doing it with talent. Do you think I'd do it if I felt...? Well, it is a very fine dividing line, so I'm not going to scream at you. But I know it is very difficult to judge, because people think the character's stronger than the music, and things like that.

"But if you don't try these bloody things out, you'll never know. I am very aware of it."

Finding an answer to this impertinence he quickly continues.

"Darling look, I wouldn't be playing that much piano if I was really concerned about my image and about my narcissistic qualities. I would be up there dancing around, doing the whole bit, holding that cat walk, not bothering to go back."

Ah, but you're equally as aware of the melodramatics. An absence from the centre of the stage to go to the side and finger the ivories merely makes your reappearance as focal point more startling.

"Well, that's it," he eagerly responds, perhaps misunderstanding the point.

"Oh, so you reckon I'm just doing that for effect and not the music?

"You've hit on a good note, but I hate to say you're wrong. The reason I go to the piano is to play the fucking thing. It so happens I can kill two birds with one stone. It creates that kind of gap which is so much more startling than me being on the stage all the time. Very true.

"My God! You do have some flair."

Darling, how grovelling of you to say so.

ALTHOUGH MERCURY may appear to exude an air of composed confidence and express a tailored answer to most questions, he is more vulnerable than he believes.

Indicative of this is his frequent use of such effeminate endearments as darling and dear when wrankled, and he is unconvincing when attempting to argue a point by alluding to the interviewer's inadequacies. "You don't seem to realise..." he will begin.

Of his multifarious talents, mind-reading is not listed in his biographies.

Similarly his image as the gallant, impetuous and highliving dandy socialite is obviously more celebrated by the media than Freddie himself.

When his background, for example, is brought into the conversation he is sensitively defensive of his Persian roots and the family ties he has in India.

"Oh you sod," he squeals. "Don't ask me about it. Read my bios. Oh, it's so mundane. Ask me about something else."

Another tender area is his own artistic stature. Criticism of his contributions to Queen he painfully bears, but with a smile. And my opinion that on Races there are only two worthwhile songs, 'Tie Your Mother Down' and 'White Man', causes Freddie to exhibit unexpected loyalty to Brian May, the songs' writer, and the other two Queens.

His arrogant streak, and above all, belief in his own talent, prevents him admitting defeat however.

"You must realise..." whoops "...that I couldn't come up with a 'Tie Your Mother Down' because I'd done it with 'Death On Two Legs'. I don't want to recreate the same formula.

"I could have written a vicious song. But that would have been too easier a comparison for people like you. I know I deliberately wrote 'You Take My Breath Away' (Races) which is keeping with 'Love Of My Life' (Opera), but I wanted to do that.

"Really, I am looking for different sources of inspiration."

This is obviously untrue because his major defence of the Races album is that it was meant to be a companion piece to A Night At The Opera; which is basically his justification to counter critics who, like myself, say the set is a grey, unimpressive shadow of its predecessor.

"I felt," he explains somewhat dubiously, "it needed two albums to put across the kind of music that we got on A Night At The Opera, and may be it was a slight progression.

"Now we've done enough. We've been talking about it, and I feel the Queen style of well-produced or production sort of albums is over. We've done to death multi-tracked harmonies and, for our own sakes and for the public's, we want to go on to a different sort of project. And the next album will be that."

HIS DEFENCE might seem absurd. It's true that the Opera and Races title concept – after all they're the names of consecutive Marx Brothers films, and the respective packaging (white and black sleeves respectively with similar art work) – support this theory.

But Queen have a reputation for being innovative with each album they make, and Mercury's elaborate arguments that they recorded Races in an attempt to avoid another musical departure seems, in the light of this, contrived.

When asked if he thought they were previously following a recording style with inherent dangers, he becomes oddly confused.

"I'm talking about from musical...I just felt we'd come...I told you before...darling, you're asking me the same questions."

No, no. Darling, you're giving the same answers to different questions. Maybe the band have just dried up, eh?

"Oh dear. Well, I'll tell you we haven't. Wheareas people have been used to us making drastic changes this is just a subtle change.

"We certainly haven't dried up. Okay, we might have taken a breather on A Day At The Races, if you like. I don't think it lacked quality. We maintained our standards.

"We've gone through stages in leaps and bounds and we've sort of come to a rest for a while. Two albums is not bad. My God, a lot of people have to do it."

Apparently Freddie would rather discuss the future. Since the completion of their Euro-tour with two concerts at Earls Court they now have three weeks to write and arrange material for their next album, although as Mercury admits, "We haven't written a damned thing yet."

This, of course, is not a major disadvantage because the new working procedure amounting to two months studio time rather than the usual four, will ensure, he claims, a refreshing rejuvenation of their artistic spirit. In short, it is a challenge – of which he enthusiastically speaks.

One suspects from what he says that Mercury is determinedly ambitious, and that he is not totally satisfied with his role within Queen. Recently he has been producing other artistes' records on his own, and similarly Taylor has worked solo, recording his own single.

Mercury might just have grander aspirations than he readily admits, and it seems appropriate to ask, as he did of me regarding this publication, just why he is content to still remain with Queen.

"If I felt the band wasn't going any place," he answers easily, "it would have been disbanded. But I think we've come a long way. And I've just got this go-ahead nature. It needs a combination of arrogance and confidence.

"Oh God, of course people can still relate to me and the band.

"Why do you think Hollywood was so successful? It's decadent and things like that. It's the kind of lifestyle," he justifies, "I've grown up with.

"We will stick to our guns," he justifies, adding firmly, "and _if_ we're worth anything we still live on."

The 'if' hangs ominously in the ensuing silence.

Join the Rock's Backpages mailing list!.

If you love our features, news and reviews, please support what we do with a one-off or regular donation. Year-on-year, our corporate advertising is down by around 90% - a figure that threatens to sink The Quietus. Hit this link to find out more and keep on Black Sky Thinking.

Chris Etches
Dec 2, 2009 6:34pm

Freddie comes across great in this interview, the NME journo can't seem to work out why if Punk is fashionable and 'Pomp' is out, why on Earth would someone in a band still do silly theatrical things? why isn't he dressed like The Clash? He seems incapable of just accepting that is how Freddie Mercury wants to do things, that it is how he feels he has to do his art and Fashion be damned.

LordEtches x

Reply to this Admin

Dec 2, 2009 8:07pm

Interesting to see how NME thought punk and new wave would mean an end to star culture. As the writer states 'A rock gig is no longer the ceremonial idolisation of Star by Fans. That whole illusion, still perpetrated by Queen, is quickly being destroyed.' Turns out the people decided differently. Showbiz stayed, celebrities rule and Freddie Mercury's intention to entertain, and also his music, are still sharp and reign to this day.

Reply to this Admin

John Tatlock
Dec 3, 2009 12:21am

Yeah, very good point.

I think it's in the nature of revolutionary moments that they're brief, and radicalise a minority, while providing a new orthodoxy for the majority. And that's the thing about punk; as a revolutionary moment, it was fantastic. As an orthodoxy, I can barely imagine anything worse; a big long laundry list of Stuff You Must Not Do.

So it's deeply ironic that someone as wayward and quirky as Fred should be being berated for Not Doing Stuff How You're Meant To Do It Now. And something of a last laugh for Queen in that the album they did straight after this, "News Of The World", was both their best, and the one in which they started to get really quite experimental, alongside the (fantastic) showbiz.

Reply to this Admin

John Blonde
Dec 3, 2009 12:46am

Maybe the NME writer couldn't handle Freddie saying "darling" because he didn't like being spoken to in gay-speak. Freddie wears things other than t-shirts and jeans and the writer can't deal with it. Does he just want Freddie to be less gay? Freddie probably decided, immediately after this interview, to become MORE gay. The leather daddy look and the video for "I Want To Break Free" must have sent the writer into fits of hysterics.

The writer decides, one album after the still stunning A Night at the Opera, that the band is washed up and should just pack it in. Glad they didn't. Not only was News of the World around the corner, but so was The Game and the best track of their entire career, "Under Pressure".

Reply to this Admin

Benoit Bursztejn (Queenaddict)
Dec 3, 2009 8:35am

Funny how well Freddie Mercury is transcripted, by a writter who doesn't seem to really understand what Queen was about...
What must he have think about the recent Q+PR project!
Anyway, it was lovely to read this article, having in mind the rest of the story...

cheers, darlings!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 3, 2009 12:19pm

In reply to Chris Etches:

Funnily enough, NME gushed iver the new Muse album and how much some of the songs favourably sounded like Queen !!!!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 3, 2009 5:51pm

Good old Fred: he could certainly hold his own up against the bunker and barbed wire mentality/approach of NME writers c. 1976/77. How he must have wished for the good old days when the NME used to send down Julie Webb to interview those are great interviews where Fred played to the gallery!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 6, 2009 12:20am

"If we're worth anything we still live on". Says it all, which is not the same for what can be said of the NME at the moment. Absolute comic.

Reply to this Admin

Teresa Johnson
Dec 6, 2009 4:30am

Freddie's genius is in full display throughout the interview, apparently whizzing right over the head of Tony the Clueless.

FM: "We will stick to our guns," he justifies, adding firmly, "and _if_ we're worth anything we still live on."

I stand corrected: "visionary genius." Long live Queen.

TS: "The 'if' hangs ominously in the ensuing silence."

What "ensuing silence," Tony? Oh. Maybe he was speaking of his career.

I'm still laughing over the picture of Fred sitting there - Muscles the Bodyguard in full loom - yet still being the perfect host, serving Tony the Clueless a "fresh salmon lunch"...

Thanks so much for posting this gem. Once again, Freddie puts a big smile on my face.

May we all have more champagne for breakfast!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 6, 2009 9:39am

OMG! Is there any wonder why Freddie hated the press??? Talk about arrogance! The so-called writer of this farce is trying to duel with the master. He's the one who displays arrogance and childishness throughout. He already has an agenda and a prejudice against Freddie and all that he fails to understand. He keeps trying to goad Freddie and persists on criticizing superficial aspects of Queen, rather than focusing on their exquisite, daring, innovative, eclectic music and spectacular performance. He keeps trying to peg Queen down, for some inexplicable reason, instead of acknowledging their talent, boldness and creativity.
Nowhere does this freak even Mention Freddie's incomparable talent, wit, and genius. Nor does he allude to the phenomenal skills of Brian, Roger, or John anywhere in the piece.
He just seems so keen on trying to make Freddie look silly, which backfires miserably, of course! He comes off looking like an incompetent fool, petty and ridiculous....And fortunately history exposed his inadequacies, both as a writer and as a music critic. It's scary that talentless creeps, like him, were set loose to interview Freddie / Queen and were given the awesome power to make or break a band, but were ill-equipped to recognize a masterpiece if it hit them on the head!
All I can hope is that he was out of a job after this slanderous, scathing piece of crap appeared on the best performer on the planet and the most awesome band ever!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 8, 2009 2:33am


Ha-ha, Freddie totally smoked that interviewer, right on. If you talk shit about a band constantly, why should they not defend themselves? Did that guy really expect Fred to go "Oh yes, you're right, we suck, we have no talent, I really don't understand why we've been so successful, My God, thank you for making that discovery! I think we'll disband now". Please. The only person that came out looking like they had their head up their own ass is Tony Stewart. This guy is just mad cause Freddie wasn't the pushover he thought he would be. Freddie totally made him his bitch. Makes me love him even more.

On another note, I thought it was incredibly classy on Fred's part to still feed him. Cause if it were me, I'd be too busy making him wear his lunch.

Reply to this Admin

Dec 8, 2009 9:11pm

No respect in this interview. Now I see why Freddie hated the British press.. I thought for a minute there, Freddie was going to tell him to "PISS OFF". Deservedly so!!! I wonder where that tart Tony Stewart is now.. If he's reading this," FUCK OFF". that was from Freddie!!!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 10, 2009 2:47am

O M G and I thought that listening to Freddie was the pinnicle. Freddie, Darling, is fabulous, adorable, funny and simply precious in any media. I look forward to reading more.

Reply to this Admin

Dec 11, 2009 12:52am

T.S....You total little fool....YOU'RE the bitch!!!! You freaking little nit! I hope you never wrote another review ever again! I am not a violent person, but I would love to stomp on your nasty little lying throat! How dare you even speak or write his name! You piece of crap!
You're not good enough to lick the turd off Freddie's boot, you maniacal, twisted maggot!
No wonder Freddie despised your guts! You never gave him a chance!
I hope they let you out of your cage just so you can read how revolting you are to us Queen fans who worship the ground Freddie walked on! Bitch!

Reply to this Admin

Dec 20, 2009 12:44pm


Oddly enough, Tony Stewart actually gave Sheer heart Attack and Night at the Opera glowing reviews a few years before this interview.

Reply to this Admin

The Barretts of Wimpole Street
Mar 8, 2010 3:55am

Hmm, I'm shocked the Quietus likes Queen. Their music isn't what I'd imagine to be The Quietus' style (you know, liked by a large amount of people, not Pitchfork-hipster approved, but I digress). Anyway, while I totally agree the interviewer was being a biased prick in this case (not unlike some people right here at The Quietus), I think Freddie allowed Tony get to him a little too much. I wouldn't attempt to justify my way of doing things to someone who clearly dislikes my style. Apparently, anything you do, no matter what, will always turn the noses of some people for whatever reason. That's why Freddie should've just kicked the guy out if he wasn't going to move on to a discussion that would actually go somewhere. Still, I think Freddie handled himself with grace, at least he didn't lose it and wish out loud that Tony would have rectal cancer, lol.

Reply to this Admin

Cheap Handbags
Dec 6, 2010 3:34am

Here we offer super quality Cheap Handbags, wallets & clutches at cheap price! Cheap Christian Dior Handbag,Cheap Coach Handbag,Cheap Dolce & Gabbana Handbag on sale!Do not hesitate to select replica brand handbags,handbags for your fashion need!

Reply to this Admin

Jun 14, 2011 9:05pm

Ironically, Tony Stewart showed up in the recent BBC2 broadcast of Days of Our Lives, 2-part documentary celebrating 40 years of Queen. One can write an entire volume (& why not Quietus?) on critical frameshop of Queen on both sides of the Atlantic - and a torturous, baffling if not hilarious chronicle that is.

On a more serious side, this penchant for misconstruing, stigmatizing Queen per whatever fashion of the day (or 60s punditry ethos) are in store, planted virulent seeds for later tabloids and even high-placed critique of Queen/Mercury in their last throes. This predilection to skew their career/business decisions, to personal lives (especially matters of race/ethnicity and sexuality/media representation of public persona), has grown into easy myths of what Queen/Mercury actually did AND intended. Complex processes, interpersonal dynamics (both among band members, with various personnel of their management and ancillary, AND their personal family relations) are all collapsed neatly into frameshop of a band that calculates, contrives, deceives, whores (figuratively, too) like some latter-day Mephisto of still-suspect musical merit. All this for what? Dealing with other people's hard-fought success from a whole lotta work. Success that is not hinged upon the usuals - straight(faced), mythical or political or suburbanite-critical cock or hipster rock.

Reply to this Admin

Jun 15, 2011 12:42am

Hey Tony whatever your name is who remembers you?

Reply to this Admin

Sep 15, 2011 2:11pm

In reply to Roger:

jaki bil freddie

Reply to this Admin

Sep 17, 2011 5:56am

cheap designer clothes

Shoes wear well

cheap designer purses

Beautiful voice

nike shox r4

Buy more get more

cheap designer purses

Discount with you

chanel online shopping

Come and see

coach outlet

We all have a lot of

coach outlet

Final clear out

chanel online

Boys can also

louis vuitton outlet

Very cute

coach stores

louis vuitton outlet Ladies choice

gucci outlet

This village does not have this shop nioce

louis vuitton outlet

Affordable fair

lv outlet

Shoes and bags are

gucci outlet

Sexy rank

chanel outlet

Men's choice

coach outlet

With good

prada outlet

Family look at Ah

replica louis vuitton

The tide online

coach outlet handbags

Beautiful Kingdom

chanel outlet

Very nice, very beautiful

Wholesale NFL Jerseys

Discounted processing

cheap nike air max

Young people the beauty of heaven

puma shoes

Clothes look good

Reply to this Admin

Sep 23, 2011 5:38am


NFL Jerseys


NFL Caps


NFL Bikini


Arizona Cardinals Jerseys


Cheap NFL Jerseys


NFL Jewelry


NFL Travel Bags


Baltimore Ravens Jerseys

at low price

Wholesale NFL Jerseys


MLB Caps

with cheap price

Soccer Caps


Indianapolis Colts Jerseys

cheap wholesale

Chicago Bears Jerseys

wholesale high-quality

Soccer Jerseys

wholesale cheap

NCAA Jerseys

wholesale discount

Philadelphia Eagles Jerseys

wholesale authentic

San Francisco 49ers Jerseys


Dalls Cowboys Jerseys


NBA Jerseys


Washington Redskins Jerseys


New Orleans Saints Jerseys

with cheap price

NFL Jerseys


NBA Caps


NHL Caps

wholesale well-designed

NBA Swingman


Minnesota Vikings Jerseys


Cleveland Browns Jerseys

wholesale cheap

NHL Jerseys


MLB Jerseys

wholesale discount

New England Patriots Jerseys


Green Bay Packers Jerseys

at discounted price

Pro Bowl Jerseys


Tennessee Titans Jerseys


Pittsburgh Steelers Jerseys


San Diego Chargers Jerseys

Reply to this Admin

Sep 27, 2011 1:58am

Inchanel bagsline, various series that all sold extreme well, such as the chanel 2.55 and chanel coco line. The detail design which are definitely appear to be quite beautiful and exciting. All girls would love to own suchchanel handbags in hand. They all consider such handbags can make one a higher status and show elegant appearance. Come to our chanel outletonline to get one.

In Gucci handbagsline, the new versions are designed for men series which appear to be exposure, and luxury colorways that designed in order to attract much more consumers. For the gucci bags2011 winter, all bags that come along with extreme colorways for you to choose from. So to make yourself fashion enough then just come to our gucci outlet store .

Herve Leger bandagenbsp;is a well-know cloth brand in the world, all the time it is committed to shaping women’s physical beauty and showing gentle sense of female silhouettes. Wearing;Herve Leger Dressnbsp;which beautiful designed and made by high quality materials will make you look charming and sexy. The winter is on the way, so it is necessary for to to own the herve leger saleto make yourself upstate.

Remember Gucci outletspring series women show;floor that dazzling high-saturation of bright colors, and full of “Forest Queen” feel of the tassels, decorative knot it? The gucci handbags designer embodies the intrinsic taste, gucci bagsis sought after by celebrities and fashion objects.;In winter season, the gucci handbags sale would be a great topic.

For these fashion ladies and wealth women, they all like to make themselves in unique style in a share. Quality and style would be the main point of these handbags, especially for the louis vuitton bags. For so many years, the company definitely released quite a lot of louis vuitton handbags in the market, and follow the fashion trend up to now. always theseLouis Vuitton outlet that sold at high price, however you can get the discount louis vuitton handbags in our bags outlet online.

Offering its just potential purchasers within of the previous just one hundred fifty extended time, Louis Vuitton pouches coupled with components are developed with one another with enhanced concerning the repaired pursuit to the caliber.Louis Vuitton Handbagsaccessories tend to be abominable advised for ambrosial application alternating with appearing a faculty authority that’s a lot of apparently in actuality why a lot of higher profile, ?many of the fashion ladies abounding approved afterwards purses and handbags,louis vuitton wallets and sun shades. To buy the excellent bags louis vuitton outletwould be a great choice.

One way for some people to get duped into buying Gucci handbags is when they hear about and come to bargained items sales, midnight markets, and the like. You'll find there, amasingly low priced, products of all kinds, but rarely will the actual items there be the real thing. Bargains aren't bad on their own, but if you're looking for the real Gucci bags, it's best to find trusted stores. The Gucci outlet store can point you to stores in your vicinity.

Louis Vuitton outlet store as one of the most luxurious brand in the world, is famous for leather goods loved by so many enthusiasts, which brings a huge business opportunity for market. We are professional trader for wholesale Louis Vuitton handbags, aiming at filling large demands as well as leading fashion trends.

Reply to this Admin

coach outlet online
Sep 28, 2011 6:14am

The Bags that you can buy in coach outlet online tend to be affordable, feel comfortable knowing that they are simply promoting traditional Coach Handbags.Coach bags on sale from the coach outlet are cheap or discount prices that you certainly will stand out from the crowd on your next camping trip!Coach coach outlet store online Our very own bag will provide an specific feelings. This type of coach handbags were named Coach Crossbody.

At the coach outlet online Store, quality products and satisfying service are provided;High safety and prompt delivery is outlet store online painstakingly maintains the image of luxury, on the one hand to keep the high-end luxury brand and to maintain the elegant aristocratic taste.As long as you open our coach factory outlet webpage, you will view various Coach New Arrivals which are the most popular also the most fashionable in this year.

At the coach outlet online Store, quality products and satisfying service are provided;High safety and prompt delivery is guaranteed.You can consult more latest new information about Coach on. coach outlet store online, In this promotion season, Coach Kristin Bags will be the best choice for you.Welcome to the coach factory outlet store and Enjoy Shopping Here! We promise all the customers to have the superior qualities and low prices.

Coach is well known for being one of the few American high-end leather goods brands. Coach Bags using a range of quality fabrics and materials and offer beautiful and high-quality items such as bags, jewelry, sunglasses,shoes and so on coach outlet online outlet has become a popular shopping experience for consumers around the world, and a desirable distribution channel for manufacturer's and factory outlet offers you the modern and very comfortable coach bags. Since many women often do not know things and are daily buses to challenge their handbags handbag, also comprehensive.

discount Louis Vuitton handbags, leaders and affordable for the American luxury brand known to create attractive designer louis vuitton outlet online store and accessories.As a fashion and modern lady, you can never have too many bags but Louis Vuitton, Louis Vuitton is a great leather handbags brand. louis vuitton bags have different look according to different designer concept.louis vuitton uk Store Online Handbags can also bring great accuracy as well as practical applicability and fashionable.If you love designer fashion purses you may have come across all the louis vuitton purse and accessories on Louis Vuitton Factory Outlet.It's a great place to buy the items.louis vuitton Store Online Handbags can also bring great accuracy as well as practical applicability and fashionable.Are you still going to buy a Coach Handbag on Coach store? Today ,there is another way to get a Coach bag.That is buying bags from louis vuitton handbags.With this way,you can not only save your shopping time,but also save your money.It sounds wonderful ,right?

You don,t need to go out of your house and wander about to find the LV Bags you like.Additionally, special discounts of the goods such as louis vuitton uk Purses are offered everyday. Hurry up!The louis vuitton bags are utilized for formal event in company area that will display your excellent taste.Not only does a briefcase make is easier to carry things.I have known Coach as a distinguished worldwide luxury brand since I was a very little girl. At that time, I often dreamed of having louis vuitton handbags of my own.

Reply to this Admin

louis vuitton online
Sep 28, 2011 6:16am

if your dream is to look like a million bucks for a mere several dollars, then our louis vuitton outlet store is the Jiminy Cricket of your existence.louis vuitton bags generally variety within the buying price of $120.00 in order to $450.00, however they perform possess little purses as well as scarfs which are below $100.00.Yesterday, I saw an advertisement of lady's handbags on Louis Vuitton Outlets Online. I was obsessed by the unique decorative pattern and special appearance of louis vuitton purse.

louis vuitton bags marketed properly all greater compared to earth and earn cozy praise from customers. They are made from the finest leather and fabric.The louis vuitton online items are charming and chic. They make you feel different. When you log in,you will enjoy the coupon code for saving money.louis vuitton uk Store Online Handbags can also bring great accuracy as well as practical applicability and fashionable.

The Louis Vuitton bag is from the latest release of Louis Vuitton Bags. Its crisp, scribble material, leather handle, perfectly complements the relaxed shape of this stylish pouch. All the items oflouis vuitton borse Store fit all of your essentials and more.borse Louis Vuitton offers free and fast shipping. Usually, ships between 5-8 business days. So you do not need to wait for a long time.On establishing contact with a louis vuitton outlet hire agency, a few clarifications would need to be put to rest prior to working out a deal.sito Louis Vuitton has been voted by Hour Detroit magazine readers as the Best of Detroit in their 12th annual readers'poll.

sac louis vuitton Pas Cher You don,t need to go out of your house and wander about to find the LV Bags you like.Additionally, special discounts of the goods such as Louis Vuitton Purses are offered everyday. Hurry up!Everyone believes the fact that sac louis vuitton damier can be well-known simply because of its high quality and the lovely pattern.louis vuitton sacs Full of charming, lovely and moving Louis Vuitton Poppy Op Art Dotted Bag Black is a chic new flower design. These beautiful chics will be shown on our Louis Vuitton Online.

Reply to this Admin

louis vuitton
Sep 30, 2011 6:23am

Louis Vuitton Outlet,Louis Vuitton
Online Store
,are famous for the Unique articules ,login Louis Vuitton Handbag On Sale to buy your articles, such as Monogram Multicolore,Monogram Canvas Handbags. Owing to the various styles and models, up-to-date styling,elegant appearance,full range of colors and designs,quality and quantity assured .Louis Vuitton Handbags have become the best seller in international market. Now, Login Louis Vuitton Handbag On Sale to choose your favorites. What's more,the latest commodities are renowned both at home and abroad for exquisite workmanship, skillful knitting and elegant design,famous for selected materials, novel designs, delightful colors and exquisite workmanship. So please take action Now!

Reply to this Admin

May 21, 2013 3:42pm

In reply to ChrisG:

i love how the 'writer' just does this whole long article about this bitchy catfight he is having, and the subtext is like why are you so gay?!

Reply to this Admin