John Frusciante
Letur-Lefr
Scott McKeating
, September 10th, 2012 00:32
For guitarist John Frusciante to have weathered the critical storms of a career as a Red Hot Chili Pepper so well is something of a minor miracle. Sure, bassist Flea might well get his props as a player for hire but still remains represented as a red-bull-amped and bobble-headed comedy caricature. With Frusciante's insanity years (relatively) behind him, the theory for some is that his light has been hidden obscured by the shadow of the Red Hot albatross.
While his prodigious solo output has included several great guitar-led albums and some interesting forages into electronica, Frusciante still hasn't cemented himself as either a fulfiller of expectations or a reliable maverick. There is a train of thought that John Frusciante may be about as close as we are going to get to a major-label-approved latter day Hendrix/Barrett/D.James amalgam. Consider that idea derailed with Letur-Lefr, his first official post-Chilis' solo release under his own name. For a five track EP of what Frusciante has called "progressive synth pop", with the exception of one track this is a record as bafflingly average as even the most generic Chili's track. What Frusciante has discovered here (and recorded way back in 2010) is a strain of acid pop electronica that's as mild and as unpleasantly odd as processed cheese. The opening track 'In Your Eyes' is awful, an opener that forces a listener to generate comparisons to a ghastly energy drink take on Yazoo with vocals by a man trapped on a vibrating weight-loss machine and simultaneously chewing tobacco and being exorcised. This is shit creek music. And your only paddle is a litre bottle of trucker's Tizer.
For the faithful, any resistance to this particular musical path will likely be put down to the rockist preference for fried-mind music played on a guitar rather than a Casio and sampler. This music may well be experimental for Frusciante but its just very conservative electronics with forgettable melodies for much of the rest of Western world. Another problem with the music here is that he's already shown himself very capable of working with electronics outside of the generics of rock and pop with the weirdo junkshop Fripp styles on A Sphere In The Heart Of Silence disc and the Speed Dealer Moms project with Aaron Funk. The place for Letur-Lefr's particular type of ordinary is the recycle bin. It's arguable whether using the Amen break in the way it's been used for the past quarter of a century is any more progressive than just doing another Chili Peppers record.
Letur-Lefr at times feels like Frusciante has discovered the brilliance of a Ceephax record and decided to research the methods, then make something that feels like a beginners 'anything goes and where's that kitchen sink?'. The joy of finding a new way of expressing yourself does not necessarily mean that others will automatically reciprocate that joy, or even interest.
As briefly alluded to earlier, there is a single chink of light in this arsecrack of darkness. The pre-release leak of the instrumental track 'Glowe' definitely helped boost expectations; a wise choice considering the brutal reality of the EP's other tracks. Even at a miniscule 1:28, 'Glowe' it's still a genuinely affecting piece of guitar noodlyness and an analogue warm chop-and-edit of breakbeats. Whether by chance or bizzaro conscious decision, Frusciante has made a track that sounds like someone ordered The JBs to do a super cute and funky take on the Bomb Squad's style. As if the rest of the EP wasn't duff enough, Letur-Lefr compounds its errors with poor vocal turns from the likes of Wu-Tang affiliate Kinetic 9. Amongst this aural garbage masquerading as lyricism there are Frusciante's own hit/miss vocals, snippets of the RZA giggling and even snatches of vocal samples from what sounds suspiciously like Humphrey Bogart and William Shatner. You couldn't make it up. And finally to add injury to insults, his ex-bandmate Flea has just dropped Helen Burns a pay-what-you-want EP thats soundscapes musically references Duke Ellington, The Flaming Lips and Jon Hassell with an overall sense of pastoral BoCness. Flea's guests? A couple of drummers, Patti Smith and Silverlake Conservatory children's and adult choir. It's pretty much everything that Letur-Lefr isn't – progressive and beautiful genre-mash music. Not that it's a competition or anything.
Sep 10, 2012 7:21am
In reply to Liam Richards:
Its up there with The DC EP as one of his weakest releases.The first and last songs are good but the MCs just dont work. But if youre a Frusciante fan youll like it, if youre not- you wont. If youre new to his work start with To Record Water or The Empyrean. Those are beautiful records.
Sep 10, 2012 7:28am
Hit me with some specifics on why I've got it wrong if you want. I'm happy to backtrack if I can. Big Frusciante fan - that's why this is such a big disappointment to me.
Sep 10, 2012 10:08am
Frusciante said on many occasions that he's trying to break the patterns of the western world music and the 4/4. Not that western world isn't already too demanding and annoying.
Oh, and you missed an apostrophe here:
"but its just very conservative electronics"
Sep 10, 2012 4:57pm
A bit harsh. Whilst I think a lot of your points are perfectly valid - the electronic work comes off as unsophisticated and outdated, some of the guest MC work is hit/miss (I wouldn't say it's completely detestable, though) - the tone for this review is too overtly scathing, the reviewer sounds like a fan who feels he's been betrayed. It's rather disappointing at times, but not without interest - take it from a distant standpoint, and it's not awful.
I personally like some of the guitar parts (e.g. Glowe, as mentioned prior, as well as some of the work at the end In Your Eyes), as well as some nice vocal moments (e.g. backing vocals behind Glowe), some interesting opening samples (e.g. end of 909 Day/start of Glowe), and some of the more schizophrenic moments of In Your Eyes (i.e. the five seconds or so of sudden breakcore beat sampling at about the 1.30 mark). Even if the actual sounds behind a lot of these tracks are outdated and the synth work a little cringey (beginning of In My Light makes me wince, although it gets better when the drums kick in), I wouldn't call it bland per se - there's usually a lot of interest and layers going on to pick through.
Ignore the tone of the instruments, and pay attention to the melodies/rhythms, and it's rather nice - I honestly wish he'd used different tools for it, it's such a roughly cut thing in my humble opinion, but it's insulting to compare this to the likes of Stadium Arcadium in pure level of mediocrity.
Sep 10, 2012 5:22pm
Such a wrong review in many ways, not only because of that missing apostrophe...
Sep 10, 2012 5:53pm
Waaaay to nice. This review could have just been: why would anyone give a flying fuck about a side project from a member of the Red Hot Chili Peppers?
Sep 10, 2012 6:01pm
I think this EP is quite thrilling actually. The beat making and synth work is tight and unique. The vocals are great. But beyond the technical aspects of it, it just feels fresh and exciting. And I find 'Glowe' to be the weakest track on here. 909 day is the standout for me.
Sep 10, 2012 6:03pm
not that it's a competition but flea's record was a bit stale and mostly boring.
Sep 10, 2012 6:49pm
In reply to Rikki Jazzercise:
Listen to Niandra LaDes and Usually Just a T-Shirt. Probably one of the most screwed up albums I own, and probably one of the better ones, too. John Frusciante has been making music solo which has nothing to do with the Chili Peppers for quite a while.
Sep 11, 2012 8:20am
dude- i see what you did there - you know music..you're the man... you win. john knows shit and you are the winner - music is sport..
Sep 11, 2012 12:29pm
"The joy of finding a new way of expressing yourself does not necessarily mean that others will automatically reciprocate that joy, or even interest."
It also doesn't mean that others won't reciprocate that joy, regardless of how 'awful' the reviewer finds it.
Sep 12, 2012 9:48am
I stopped visiting the Quietus ages ago. Cheers for reminding me why Scott..
Sep 16, 2012 12:03am
In reply to Jacob :
i agree 100% with you. this writer is an idiot who does not appreciate music that he is unfamiliar with
Sep 18, 2012 10:01am
There is nothing unfamiliar about 'Letur-Lefr', that's a good part of the record's problem.
Sep 18, 2012 4:21pm
I would have to completely agree. I am a massive JF fan. I love his work. From his Chili's days, Ataxia and his solo records. But even I have to say the past 2 releases have been something that barely reflect music on any level. I am all for experimentation. I think that is where JF normally thrives. But this is somethign else. It feels like he has tried too many things at once. Which is fine. But you can't expect every release to be gold. Especially if you almost single handedly disregard everything else you have once done. I am sure he will release more engaging records. But I feel this one is being heralded by some to be a triumph purely out of some dillusioned legiance to JF. I am a massive fan. But I felt this missed the mark musically. I think if a new upcoming artist released this as their first record.... they would never get a record again. And not because of commercial appeal.
Sep 18, 2012 10:31pm
McKeating: You clearly have no musical talent which is why you are stuck reviewing albums. I think you totally missed the point of Frusciante's style, and comparing this album to Ceephax shows your lack of musical style and taste. Email me if you want some good suggestions of some music to buy, seems like your trying to hard to be someone else. You should be more comfortable with who you are as a person, take a risk in life, and push yourself harder next time you want to accomplish something, because my guess is you haven't done a lot. The album is a Frusciante album, if you like him.......you'll dig it.
Sep 19, 2012 2:06pm
In reply to Voltress :
Thanks for the life advice and tarot reading. Your point that "The album is a Frusciante album, if you like him.......you'll dig it." sounds a bit silly in the cold light of day. How can anyone possibly say that they will like anything with Frusciante's name on? What if he recorded something that sounded like a ghastly energy drink take on Yazoo with vocals by a man trapped on a vibrating weight-loss machine and simultaneously chewing tobacco and being exorcised?
Sep 19, 2012 4:50pm
In reply to Scott McKeating:
He wouldn't record something like that, thats the point. "you'll dig it" Sounds a bit silly to you maybe, but certainly not his fans. I'm beginning to wonder if you understand the concept of "art" Do you appreciate 4'33" or do you frown upon it? That will let your readers now where you stand.
Sep 24, 2012 12:59am
Scott McKeating you are a fucktard. My review of your critique: Garbage.
Eat buttmeat.
Sep 24, 2012 10:17am
This review is terrible, John frusciante is probably the greatest musician alive. He challenges your ears with every sound, and surprises me at every turn. What a boring world it would be without him. Maybe u should just stick to 4/4, I think your brain can not think fast enough for or yours are privileged enough to hear his music.
Oct 18, 2012 2:03am
Excellent review, Scott, written with clarity and humor. I am long time fan of Frusciante and hope to see him evolve beyond this "period". I found this and the PBXFIZ impossible to listen to a second time. It is a disappointing effort.
I like the closing comments on Flea's recent endeavor outside the RHCP. I always thought Flea's childhood immersion in Jazz music enables him to collaborate well with other musicians.
Oct 18, 2012 2:05am
In reply to Scott McKeating:
Scott, I applaud you being objective and not drinking the Kool-Aide.
Oct 22, 2012 5:32pm
Agree with every word in this review, and I consider myself JF fan (just not as obsessive as many others). Flea's EP simply destroys both this and PBX.
Oct 22, 2012 5:32pm
Agree with every word in this review, and I consider myself JF fan (just not as obsessive as many others). Flea's EP simply destroys both this and PBX.
Nov 14, 2012 11:47am
There is so much hate and sarcasm in your review.
I wonder why you had the need to write such stuff.
Anne
Dec 2, 2012 6:05pm
Good review. At least Scott here was honest. I am a huge Frusciante fan but this record was a disapointment. I loved niandra, smile from the streets, the empyrean, shadows... But I don't think John achieved as high a level of musical genius as on those other records.... Or any level of musical genius for that matter. That's not to say that none of the tracks have any interest whatsoever, and the odd appealing melody can be found here and there, but saying "this is a frusciante record, if you like him you'll dig it" is close to moronic. John clearly tried something different here (and props to him for that) but that simply reasserts the grounds upon which to say that this record was worse than his others.
Jan 10, 2013 11:31am
I personally love this ep, and how it makes me fee as well as the thoughts it provokes inside myself. It makes me sad however that you would spend the time to write this review. Not because I don't agree with your review, but because it gives people reasons not to like the music before they experience for themselves. I'd feel the same if you wrote a good review of it. I just wish i could listen to music from a place outside of knowing how popular it was, or have to worry about what other people think about what music i like. So i could decide for myself what i like.
Mar 25, 2013 7:45am
Forgettable melodies? They were in my head after one listen and it has been on my turntable ever since it's release. I love it.
















Goldblade
The National
Vår
The Memory Band
The Focus Group
Neon Neon
Sep 10, 2012 7:01am
What an awful and inaccurate review ...
Reply to this Admin