Rowland's Return: Dexys Live At Shepherd's Bush
Tariq Goddard
, May 12th, 2012 05:48
As Dexys prepare to release One Day I'm Going To Soar, Tariq Goddard witnesses its live debut at London's Shepherd's Bush Empire

The difference between loving and not liking and rating and simply not thinking a thing is worth consideration at all should not apply to Dexys (Midnight Runners), who were never a 'cult' band... yet outside a circle of believers, it does to a point.
While it's unsurprising that Dexys are more of an acquired taste than most groups you might hear at a wedding, the fact that they are playing Shepherd's Bush and not headlining Heaton Park shows that this is a reformation with short arms. Bands with far less of a knack for strong chorus's (anyone from Pink Floyd to Oasis) enjoy a general acceptance that Dexys have never quite attained.
The critical excitement (generated mainly by devotees of which I am one) that surrounds their new album, One Day I'm Going To Soar has met with wider bafflement, for Dexys have an unwarranted image problem.
This is particularly ironic as for the initiated Dexys image(s) were one of their great strengths. Theirs was a short career that did not really resemble itself, each album looking like it could have been recorded by a different group, a forgotten MOR solo record and a transvestite covers phase baffling those that followed lead singer Kevin Rowland's later career, the most famous image of the band still being the dungaree coeds of 'Too-Rye-Ay' that I first encountered on children's TV twenty years ago. Just as with the Ivy League look of 'Don't Stand Me Down', a lot of people chose to smirk, roll their eyes and not get it. For them Rowland was not a meticulous genius, planning the narrative of his career arc as a general would a battle, just a guy with a couple of good tunes who looked a bit odd. That is a mis-perception that the current incarnation of the group ought to bury forever, should the world receive them as Shepherds Bush did.
The downside with genius is humourlessness, or a peculiar sense of humour that sells your talent short. Tonight, Rowland's humour is somewhere in-between, like Caligula he dares you to laugh in the wrong places, sandwiching passion, which is really his thing, with therapeutic stand up.
The passion veers more towards yearning these days than anger, and co vocalist Pete Williams is nearer a confidante than comic foil, despite dressing up as a policeman at one point. Rowland is all energy and resembles an aging Maltese Shakespeare as he acts out his songs, his outfit pure Guys and Dolls, the rest of the band similarly though less severely attired.
Trombonist 'Big' Jim Patterson, the bands gravitational centre, stands to one side like an extra from the Kansas scenes from The Wizard of Oz, his overalls having seen long service in hard stations, Rowland only taking his tie off for an encore, all nine individuals looking very much a band.
The opening is characteristically challenging, the opening eleven songs in fact, as the still unreleased album is played in its chronological entirety. Dexys range and sense of history is sufficiently integrated for this to not sound as demanding as it should, and the ever diminishing returns of touring as a greatest hits act were never going to appeal to Rowland. As the venue is all seated anyone who wanted to drift to the bar has a row of laps to surf over, so the band are at least guaranteed a necessarily captive audience.
The crowd watches and listens but can't really participate yet and the curiosity in the room is palpable. Fortunately the new material is compelling yet closer to a tightly scripted musical than a gig, the action seemingly choreographed and precise. Though not a concept album there is a theme, one man's changing attitude towards his own capacity to love, to not love, and to wonder what it is to love. To his credit Rowland makes light work of it. The object of this emotional journey is new member Madeleine Hyland, first superimposed over the stage as a giant ideal of beauty to which Rowland addresses his songs, then joining him on stage in her human incarnation.
This is nearly too cute a conceit for such honest songs. The cabaret touches and theatrical mood (Rowland collapses on stage, Hyland pulls a lot of faces) neither compliments or takes anything away from the material, her presence perhaps better reduced to a solely musical contribution.
The tension slackens during the only 'tidy' period of the evening, Ex-Style Councilor and former member Mick Talbot's mainly inspired contribution ambles into a Sade-ean cul-de-sac, the track rescued from a jazzy grave by Rowland's vocal anti-polish. His voice is as powerful as it is idiosyncratic, its English finish localizing it pleasingly, the reach and force contrasting beautifully with the spoken word parts that come and go throughout. Rounding off with 'It's Okay John-Joe' Rowland switches between song and words, conducting a transcendence that can be turned on and off, the sense that Dexys is a vehicle for his personal disclosure stronger than ever.
Despite knowing his onions Rowland is not interested in clever self reference, Dexys songs, even when they riff off the music that inspired them (he sings Marvin Gaye at one point) are not about other songs, however much they are endowed with the same spirit as his heroes. Rowland looks beyond cliche and pastiche into life and the experiences that music will always be the purest response to. At its best much of tonight ('Tell Me When My Light Turns Green', 'Until I Believe In My Soul') does more than thrill in its own right; it persuades the listener that exposure to this stuff will help anticipate the next outbreak of love they encounter, allow them to understand it better, even enjoy it more.
Weirdly 'Come On Eileen', never a surprise to hear at a public event, comes as a welcome shock here. That it is an obvious choice shows an endearing softening in Rowland and the crowd are on their feet and stay there, the song retrieved from the cultural history of the last twenty years and properly rediscovered. The show finishes with 'Tell Me What She's Like', the music powerful, muscular and confident, the fiddle and brass creating one of the most unusual wall of sounds a happy audience has ever gone home to. Apparently they always perform like this.
Contemporary music may be too diffuse and niche-driven for Rowland and Dexys to enjoy any kind of centrality again, far less appear on children's TV, not unless 'Geno' is covered on Pop Idol or Rowland appears on Celebrity Big Brother. Neither will happen. In the meantime there will be few reformations attempted for motives as pure or results as worthy of those motives as Dexys.
Tariq Goddard's new novel The Message is out now on zer0 books. He will be reading from it at the Salisbury Playhouse Theatre on May 27th
May 12, 2012 6:11pm
@Stuart, good luck with your essay reading but no need for it as a concert review,,,,
May 12, 2012 9:22pm
..sounds to me like Tariq is stuck way too far up his own arse !..
May 13, 2012 12:21am
Bollocks. As someone who has a tenuous interest in Dexys at best I thought it was thought provoking and, pleasingly, a challenge. Great review.
May 13, 2012 1:42pm
I was looking forward to reading this review.
Then wished I hadn't.
Shockingly clunky.
Unlike Paul Laird's lovely pastiche.
Where brevity, soul and wit are all present.
PS. "...the Too-Rye-Ay' that I first encountered on children's TV twenty years ago".
That'll be the album released in 1982 will it?
May 13, 2012 8:32pm
That really was a terribly written review and that first paragraph makes absolutely no sense at all. I'm no fan of Dexys but I'm intrigued as to what went down at the gig. Having somehow made it to the bottom of this guff I'm still no fucking wiser. Shame, because The Quietus really does run some great reviews.
May 14, 2012 8:35pm
"The difference between loving and not liking and rating and simply not thinking a thing is worth consideration at all should not apply to Dexys (Midnight Runners), who were never a 'cult' band... yet outside a circle of believers, it does to a point."
Can someone please explain what the hell this is supposed to mean? Quietus, can you have someone edit (or at the very least read) articles before you publish them?
May 15, 2012 4:46am
I thought this was an excellent piece, and Sean, the meaning of the sentence you quote is perfectly clear - Dexys are in the strange situation of having had some massive hits yet still being completely misunderstood by most people, outside their fervent cult following.
This is what music journalism used to be like before it became just another branch of PR. If you don't like or understand it, read Q.
May 15, 2012 7:21am
In reply to Seán:
There is a vocal minority who read this site who don't really seem to understand the difference between writing they don't like and bad writing. Also, if I published something as bad as Paul Laird's review I would hounded in the street by an angry mob. And quite rightly so, it's fucking awful.
May 15, 2012 12:53pm
I think the real question here is; has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
May 15, 2012 5:17pm
Great review by someone who deserves to read closely. I'm a fan already and can't wait to see his own gig!
May 17, 2012 2:48pm
In reply to John Doran:
There is a vocal minority who read this site who don't really seem to understand the difference between writing they don't like and bad writing. Also, if I published something as bad as Paul Laird's review I would hounded in the street by an angry mob. And quite rightly so, it's fucking awful.
Dear John
Is my review as awful as your response to it?
I'm fairly sure that what you meant to write was;
"...I would BE hounded in the street by an angry mob"
Always a good idea, I think, to make sure that when you are taking pot-shots at the quality, or otherwise, of the writing of another that you make absolutely sure that your own writing is free of flaw.
The truth of the matter is that my "review" was a pastiche of "This is what she's like" and the conversational tone of much of the new Dexys album...unlike the review that you chose to publish it had a bit of warmth, a bit of passion and managed to give a sense of what the music and the performance did to the audience member.
I realise that it must be very difficult for you when something that you have deemed fit for publication is judged to be, well, a bit rubbish...nobody likes to have their judgement called into question. I'm not really sure why you decided to attack my contribution to the thread...I simply provided my own thoughts and prefaced them with the suggestion that they captured the "spirit" of the evening in a way that your reviewer hadn't managed.
I stand by that.
But, if your own ego is so fragile that you feel the need to lash out at your readers when they dare to make a contribution to the debate/discussion section of the site then you crack on.
I'll send you links to some of the reviews I'll have published in a national newspaper with a readership that dwarfs that of "The Queitus" in a few weeks and see if you like those any better. Alternatively you can set your Sky+ box to record some of the TV reports I'm lined up to do.
Thankfully the editors and producers of those media outlets don't share your views on my writing.
Cheerio.
Paul
May 17, 2012 8:43pm
In reply to John Doran:
I find it incredibly patronising of you to assume that I did not "understand" this review simply because I didn't like the writing, that this is terrible writing, which does a disservice both to the band and audience at the concert is borne out by the comments here and on Dexys Facebook page. I noticed that you removed the link from your own Facebook page, so presumably you are trying to sweep this embarrasment under the carpet. Paul's off the cuff pastiche review was miles better, and spoke directly to Dexys fans, who could see straight away what he was doing, but it seemed to go entirely over your head. So stick to your praising hipster bands who are huge on Youtube, and knocking hipster bands who are releasing their third albums. Leave Dexys to people who know about music, yeah?
May 17, 2012 9:10pm
@Tim Russell "Dexys are in the strange situation of having had some massive hits yet still being completely misunderstood by most people, outside their fervent cult following." I understood your interpretation of this writers incredibly muddled opening sentence except for the fact that you say Dexys have a cult following and he seems to say that they didn't, so for you to say that it is perfectly clear and then to say something that seems to be the exact opposite of (who knows) what he is trying to say, kind of proves my point that maybe an editorial eye should have been cast over this piece before it was published.
May 17, 2012 10:47pm
Paul,
You emailed us asking to have your garbage printed on the site. We let you down gently. Now you're hanging round on the comments section of the piece that ran instead of yours nearly a week later. Fucking hell man! Have some self-respect! I'm already looking forward to your documentaries and writing in the New Yorker and all this other amazing stuff that's happened since we knocked you back five days ago. Best, John D
May 18, 2012 4:07am
In reply to John Doran:
John Doran wrote:
Paul,
You emailed us asking to have your garbage printed on the site. We let you down gently. Now you're hanging round on the comments section of the piece that ran instead of yours nearly a week later. Fucking hell man! Have some self-respect! I'm already looking forward to your documentaries and writing in the New Yorker and all this other amazing stuff that's happened since we knocked you back five days ago. Best, John D
What I actually sent to Luke Turner at the quietus was this;
Hi Luke
Great.
I was at the Glasgow show on Sunday night.
It was, without question, the greatest live show I've ever seen.
For what it's worth this is what I put up on my facebook page as soon as I got home...
(and then pasted in my "review" of the concert)
So, far from "...asking to have this garbage" printed on the site what I had actually done was share my thoughts on the concert with one of the staff of the quietus because I assumed that, like me, they were genuinely excited about the return of one of this nations greatest Artists.
At no point did I ask for this "garbage" to be printed.
A few days later after some positive feedback on the comments section I, jokingly, stated that my "review" should replace the official one...it's obvious my tongue is firmly in cheek thanks to the presence of an exclamation mark at the end of that contribution.
Online editor in not letting facts get in way of good story shock...
It isn't possible for you, John, to let me down, gently or otherwise, from something that didn't happen.
As for your suggestion that I "...have some self respect" and your declaration that you are looking forward to my contributions to the New Yorker; was it you who wrote that the quietus wanted to be "not in thrall to snarky one-upmanship" in the About Us section of the site?
Ahem.
Of course I'm hanging around the comments section...that's what people do when they have made a contribution to the comments section; they comment, read the comments of others, reply to those and on and on and on.
No contributions to the New Yorker from me John but press accredited, reviews to be featured in a mainstream daily newspaper and a handful of television appearances discussing film on a national television show.
That's not snarky one-upmanship...that's a bit of self-defence after having my writing called "...fucking awful" by an editor of a website that I support by reading, commenting on and sharing with others via a link on my own blog.
Quite why you have decided to so aggressively attack me is anyones guess.
Paul
May 18, 2012 7:43am
Come on then... fess up: which newspaper and which TV show? You don't seem very proud if you don't mind me saying.
May 18, 2012 9:40am
In reply to John Doran:
No acknowledgement of the fact that you lied about my having contacted you asking to have my "review" published?
Hmmmm. The more you say the more you reveal.
I'll keep the details of my media commitments to myself I think John.
I'll trade you though...you apologise for suggesting that I had asked for my " review" to be published and I'll give up the names.
You are very good at the snarky one-upmanship you publicly declare you despise.
What does that say about you I wonder?
Thanks for taking the time to respond though...your readers appreciate these little personal attentions.
Paul
May 18, 2012 5:08pm
In reply to John Doran:
Dear John
Thank you for your very sweet email.
I understand why you couldn't say what you did here but I wanted to say thank you publicly.
You're a good egg.
Not many men would be so willing to acknowledge their mistakes.
Paul
May 18, 2012 6:42pm
Jesus. What a criminal mastermind this guy is. He's like a chess grandmaster, always one step ahead.
















Chris Corsano & Bill Orcutt
Kylesa
Kanye West
Polysics
The Cleaners From Venus
Melt Yourself Down
May 12, 2012 2:42pm
A great gig!
Good old Kevin's gonna be alright.
Indeed he is
More of same please
Reply to this Admin